A new exhibit reveals America’s isolationist attitudes and policies during the Holocaust—and speaks to where the country still stands today.
Veterans of the last administration are learning a hard lesson: Policies constructed by executive order and executive agreement are just as easily blown up by them.
Eisenhower—embodying prudence, diligence, and broad-mindedness—offers conservatives in the age of Trump a different model of leadership.
Trump’s attack on Syria was unserious but intended to relieve emotional pressure—and in many ways, worse than doing nothing at all.
If Americans were more familiar with the complex heroes of their past, they would be better equipped to recognize people of good character today.
Before he was the national-security adviser, he wrote a lacerating account of generals who failed in advising Lyndon Johnson. What will he say now that he is free to talk about Trump?
Tillerson’s dismissal leaves the White House more than ever the conniving and dishonest court of an erratic, ill-informed, and willful monarch.
Last weekend’s security conference in Munich was a stark reminder that this class has nothing of substance to offer a world in turmoil.
Military parades say more about those who order and watch them than those who participate in them.
The commitment of ordinary citizens to democratic ideals is being tested each day—and its enduring strength is containing the damage of Trump’s presidency.
Darkest Hour presents Churchill as a Trump-like populist—and in the process, elides the lessons contemporary audiences might learn from his wartime leadership.
There are sounds, for those who can hear them, of the preliminary and muffled drumbeats of war.
Is it better approached as a sacred text, or examined like the scat of a shaggy, woodland beast?
Rex Tillerson’s successor will inherit the monumental task of cleaning up the mess he’s made of the State Department.
Character remains the issue that confronts us in almost every story about national politics today.
Senator John McCain and White House Chief of Staff John Kelly offered starkly different visions of service—and of America.
“If he does remain, it will be yet another sign of the collapse of self respect among those who are now willing to serve in senior positions in government.”
For all the visible damage the president has done to the nation’s global standing, things are much worse below the surface.
Many presidential appointees face an agonizing choice—leave the president with fewer restraints on his darker impulses, or stay to serve the republic even if it costs their integrity.
If loose words about fire and fury are a mere negotiating tactic, they will not deliver what the United States desires.