Politics & Policy

The Future of the American Idea

Latest

  • Mike Blake / Reuters

    Why ESPN Is More Political Than Before

    The sports network’s controversial transformation is driven  more by the audience and less by elites than many observers realize.

  • Most Popular on The Atlantic
    • North Koreans watch news report showing North Korea's Hwasong-12 intermediate-range ballistic missile launch on an electronic screen.
      Kyodo via Reuters

      What Total Destruction of North Korea Means

      As Trump considers military options, he’s drawing unenforceable red lines.

      Speaking before the UN General Assembly today, President Donald Trump announced that, unless North Korea gives up its nuclear weapons and ballistic missile programs, “the United States will have no choice but to totally destroy” the country.  He sounded almost excited as he threatened, “Rocket Man is on a suicide mission for himself and for his regime.”

      North Korea is a serious problem, and not one of Trump’s making—the last four American presidents failed to impede North Korea’s progress towards a nuclear weapon. President George H.W. Bush took unilateral action, removing U.S. nuclear weapons and reducing America’s troop levels in the region, hoping to incentivize good behavior; Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush tried to negotiate restrictions; President Barack Obama mostly averted his eyes. North Korea defied them all.

      Continue Reading
    • Jasu Hu

      Have Smartphones Destroyed a Generation?

      More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

      One day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

      Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

      Continue Reading
    • Dan Saelinger

      The Irrationality of Alcoholics Anonymous

      Its faith-based 12-step program dominates treatment in the United States. But researchers have debunked central tenets of AA doctrine and found dozens of other treatments more effective.

      J.G. is a lawyer in his early 30s. He’s a fast talker and has the lean, sinewy build of a distance runner. His choice of profession seems preordained, as he speaks in fully formed paragraphs, his thoughts organized by topic sentences. He’s also a worrier—a big one—who for years used alcohol to soothe his anxiety.

      J.G. started drinking at 15, when he and a friend experimented in his parents’ liquor cabinet. He favored gin and whiskey but drank whatever he thought his parents would miss the least. He discovered beer, too, and loved the earthy, bitter taste on his tongue when he took his first cold sip.

      His drinking increased through college and into law school. He could, and occasionally did, pull back, going cold turkey for weeks at a time. But nothing quieted his anxious mind like booze, and when he didn’t drink, he didn’t sleep. After four or six weeks dry, he’d be back at the liquor store.

      Continue Reading
    • Jesse Draxler; Photo: David Hume Kennerly / Getty

      The First White President

      The foundation of Donald Trump’s presidency is the negation of Barack Obama’s legacy.

      It is insufficient to state the obvious of Donald Trump: that he is a white man who would not be president were it not for this fact. With one immediate exception, Trump’s predecessors made their way to high office through the passive power of whiteness—that bloody heirloom which cannot ensure mastery of all events but can conjure a tailwind for most of them. Land theft and human plunder cleared the grounds for Trump’s forefathers and barred others from it. Once upon the field, these men became soldiers, statesmen, and scholars; held court in Paris; presided at Princeton; advanced into the Wilderness and then into the White House. Their individual triumphs made this exclusive party seem above America’s founding sins, and it was forgotten that the former was in fact bound to the latter, that all their victories had transpired on cleared grounds. No such elegant detachment can be attributed to Donald Trump—a president who, more than any other, has made the awful inheritance explicit.

      Continue Reading
    • Several young women being received by noblemen
      Eleanor Fortescue-Brickdale / Library and Archives Canada

      How One Woman Brought the 'Mother's Curse' to Canada

      Old French Canadian genealogy records reveal how a harmful mutation can hide from natural selection in a mother's DNA.

      The first King’s Daughters—or filles du roi—arrived in New France in 1663, and 800 more would follow over the next decade. Given their numbers, they were not literally the king’s daughters of course.

      They were poor and usually of common birth, but their passage and dowry were indeed paid by King Louis XIV for the purpose of empire building: These women were to marry male colonists and have many children, thus strengthening France’s hold on North America.

      And so they did. The filles du roi became the founding mothers of French Canadians, for whom these women are a source of historical pride. A grand old restaurant in Montreal was named after the filles du roi. So is a roller-derby team. French Canadians can usually trace their ancestry back to one or more of these women. “French Canadian genealogy is so well documented, it’s just a piece of cake to trace any line you have,” says Susan Colby, a retired archaeologist who comes from a French Canadian family and has done some of that tracing herself.

      Continue Reading
    • Morphart Creation/Shutterstock/The Atlantic

      Why No One Can Design a Better Speculum

      The gynecological device may have an ethically fraught history, but it's hard to improve on the design.

      Few women enjoy pelvic exams: the crinkly paper dress, the awkward questions, the stirrups, the vague fear that can comes with doctors’s visits of any kind (what if they find something abnormal, something bad, something cancerous?). But perhaps no piece of the pelvic exam is as reviled as the vaginal speculum—the cold, clicking, duck-billed apparatus that lifts and separates the vaginal walls so a near-stranger can peer inside.

      The speculum’s history is, like many medical histories, full of dubious ethics. Versions of the speculum have been found in medical texts dating back to the Greek physician Galen in 130 A.D. and shown up in archaeological digs as far back as 79 A.D. amidst the dust of Pompeii. (The artifact from Pompeii is a bit of a nightmare: two blades that open and close via a corkscrew-like mechanism.)

      Continue Reading
    • Silhouette of a doctor looking at an MRI scan
      Don Carstens / Getty

      Reading the Bible Through Neuroscience

      What was it like inside the brain of an ancient prophet?

      James Kugel has been spent his entire scholarly career studying the Bible, but some very basic questions about it still obsess him. What was it about the minds of ancient Israelites that allowed them to hear and see God directly—or at least, to believe that they did? Were the biblical prophets literally hearing voices and seeing visions, understanding themselves to be transmitting God’s own exact words? If so, why did such direct encounters with God become rarer over time?

      In his new and final book, The Great Shift, Kugel investigates these questions through the lens of neuroscientific findings. (The approach is reminiscent of other recent books, like Kabbalah: A Neurocognitive Approach to Mystical Experiences, co-written by a neurologist and a mysticism scholar.) First, Kugel uses biblical research to show that ancient people had a “sense of self” that was fundamentally different from the one modern Westerners have—and that this enabled them to experience and interpret prophecy differently than we do. Then he uses scientific research to show that we shouldn’t assume their view was wrong. If anything, our modern Western notion of the bounded, individual self is the anomaly; most human beings throughout history conceived of the self as a porous entity open to intrusions. In fact, much of the rest of the world today still does.

      Continue Reading
    • Customers shopping at Toys R Us
      Alan Diaz / AP

      Toys Aren’t Us

      Millennials may have loved the big-box chain as kids, but as parents, they’d rather shop online.

      In a year of constant bad news across the retail sector, Toys “R” Us has become a little engine that couldn’t, filing for bankruptcy in a federal court in Virginia Monday night. As part of its bankruptcy plan, the company will continue to operate most of its stores through the holiday season, when the company has traditionally pulled in the most revenue.

      The bankruptcy marks a new phase for a chain that has struggled to find its way online, a vulnerability for a company whose primary customers are parents. While the convenience of online shopping is a boon to most consumers, for parents it may be even more of a draw. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the vast majority of households do not have a stay-at-home parent. After a full day of work, there’s dinner to be served, baths to be drawn, and bedtime rituals to be undertaken at length. Squeezing in a trip to the store is often impossible.

      Continue Reading

    • Look Inside a Chicken Nugget

      Doctors at the University of Mississippi dissected two chicken nuggets, looked at them under a microscope, and were "astounded."

      The chicken nugget can conjure purity. No buns, pickles, or bones. Not many carbs, apart from the breading. This is simplicity delivered economically, flightless birds, protein for the protein-hungry America of today—or, to followers of Michael Pollan, the corn-fed-meat-wrapped-in-corn-preserved-breading-dipped-in-corn-sweetened-goo kind of purity.

      Richard D. deShazo, MD, is a distinguished professor of medicine and pediatrics at University of Mississippi Medical Center. He does not see purity. At least, not anymore.

      “I was floored. I was astounded,” deShazo said of the moment he looked at a chicken nugget under a microscope.

      Continue Reading
    • President Donald Trump steps up to deliver his address to the United Nations General Assembly.
      Kevin Lamarque / Reuters

      A Radical Rebuke of Barack Obama's Foreign Policy Legacy

      Donald Trump used his first address at the United Nations to redefine the idea of sovereignty.

      Donald Trump’s first speech to the United Nations can best be understood as a response to his predecessor’s final one. On September 20, 2016, Barack Obama told the UN General Assembly that “at this moment we all face a choice. We can choose to press forward with a better model of cooperation and integration. Or we can retreat into a world sharply divided, and ultimately in conflict, along age-old lines of nation and tribe and race and religion.”

      Three hundred and sixty-four days later, Trump delivered America’s answer: Option number two. His speech on Tuesday turned Obama’s on its head. Obama focused on overcoming the various challenges—poverty, economic dislocation, bigotry, extremism—that impede global “integration,” a term he used nine times. Trump didn’t use the term once. Obama used the word “international” 14 times, always positively (“international norms,” “international cooperation,” “international rules,” “international community”). Trump used it three times, in each case negatively (“unaccountable international tribunals,” “international criminal networks,” “the assassination of the dictator's brother using banned nerve agents in an international airport”) Obama warned of a world “sharply divided… along age-old lines of nation and tribe and race and religion.” Trump replied by praising “sovereignty” or invoking “sovereign” no fewer than 19 times. And while he didn’t explicitly defend divisions of “tribe and race and religion,” he talked about the importance of nations “preserving the cultures,” which is a more polite way of saying the same thing.

      Continue Reading
    More Popular Stories
  • Joshua Roberts / Reuters

    Republican Donors Are Helping Cover Trump's Legal Bills

    Amidst aggressive fundraising to support his reelection, the wealthiest president in American history is tapping the Republican National Committee and his campaign to pay Russia-related lawyer fees.

  • Congress
    J. Scott Applewhite / AP

    The Two Republicans Who Will Likely Determine Obamacare's Fate

    A last-minute repeal vote could come down to Senators John McCain and Lisa Murkowski, who opposed the GOP’s most recent proposal in July and are facing competing pressures from their state’s governors.

  • Mike Segar / Reuters

    Is Trump's 'Wiretap' Claim Vindicated?

    The president’s defenders say reported surveillance of Paul Manafort justifies an accusation against Barack Obama, but they overstate the facts.

  • Newsletter
    Mary Altaffer / AP

    The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Elton Don

    During his first address before the United Nations General Assembly, President Trump referred to North Korean leader Kim Jong Un as “rocket man.”

  • Global
    Shannon Stapleton / Reuters

    Trump Threatens to 'Totally Destroy North Korea'

    The president also hinted at the UN General Assembly that the U.S. might quit the Iran nuclear agreement.

  • Win McNamee / Getty Images

    Five Questions About the Manafort Investigation

    CNN and The New York Times on Monday shed new light on the federal investigation into the former Trump campaign chairman, but some aspects of the probe remain mysterious.

  • Kevin Lamarque / Reuters

    Can Conservative Journalism Survive?

    The right’s old guard faces an existential threat in populism. But it isn’t yet clear that they understand the stakes or possess the confidence to fight back.

  • Writers
    All Writers
  • Brennan Linsley / AP

    How the GOP Prompted the Decay of Political Norms

    The Republican Party laid the groundwork for dysfunction long before Donald Trump was elected president.

  • Politics Daily
    Andrew Harnik / AP

    The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Third Time's the Charm?

    Senators Lindsey Graham and Bill Cassidy's health-care proposal received the endorsement of Arizona Governor Doug Ducey, which could lead to Senator John McCain backing the measure.

  • Yuri Gripas / Reuters

    Why Is Trump's Legal Team So Messy?

    Ty Cobb, a lawyer for the president, kvetched about a colleague in public and sent several bizarre emails. And that’s only the latest West Wing attorney problem.

  • Congress
    Yuri Gripas / Reuters

    Groundhog Day for Obamacare Repeal

    The GOP is still missing the crucial 50th Senate vote for the Graham-Cassidy proposal. But a looming deadline is providing new momentum, and the legislation has advanced from no-shot to long-shot.

  • Health
    Andrew Harnik / AP

    The Graham-Cassidy Obamacare Repeal Bill Still Covers Fewer People

    The new Affordable Care Act replacement currently making rounds in the Senate looks different than previous efforts, but the fundamentals are still the same: fewer funds, fewer rules, and fewer people covered.

  • Supreme Court
    Yuri Gripas/ Reuters

    When Beliefs and Identities Clash in Court

    The Supreme Court may not be the right place to settle the Masterpiece Cakeshop case, which pits marriage equality against religious freedom.

  • Culture
    Aaron Bernstein / Reuters

    Challenging the Dogmas of Right and Left

    Two authors, Mark Lilla and Henry Olsen, see a politics rejecting the broad messages of Roosevelt and Reagan for the narrow claims of victim-group grievance and purist ideology.

  • Culture
    Jim Urquhart / Reuters

    When Mormons Aspired to Be a ‘White and Delightsome’ People

    A historian looks at the legacy of racism in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

  • Dominick Reuter / Getty Images

    The Rust Belt Needs Legal Immigration

    President Trump supports a plan that would halve the number of newcomers—and cut off the Midwest’s “demographic lifeline.”

  • Culture
    Mike Segar / Reuters

    Mike Huckabee and the Rise of Christian Media Under Trump

    The former Arkansas governor has a new television show on Trinity Broadcasting Network, and a powerful first guest.

  • The Presence of Justice
    Allen Breed / AP

    What's the Right Punishment for Tearing Down a Confederate Monument?

    In Durham, the sheriff and district attorney appear divided over whether civil disobedience deserves greater leniency from the judicial system.

  • Congress
    Joshua Roberts / Reuters

    Cutting Taxes Will Be Harder Than Trump Thinks

    Failure is always an option—especially in Congress.

  • J. Scott Applewhite / AP

    Why Trump Should Worry More About Congress Than About Mueller

    It’s public hearings that tend to galvanize opposition and jeopardize presidents.