It was the sort of thing Steve Jobs might’ve said at an Apple event: “It’s details like these we worked hard to get right—these little things that make the whole experience easier and more seamless.” But it wasn’t him—it was a guy named Clay Bavor.
Bavor is Google’s vice president for virtual reality, and he was talking about the company’s new VR headset. And in the hour before he climbed on a stage in San Francisco Tuesday morning, a slew of other Google executives shot off similar lines as they announced a new smartphone called Pixel, the first-ever Android phone designed entirely by Google.
The whole product-launch event sounded equal parts Google and Apple. It built on Google’s strengths—nearly two decades of search-engine dominance—at the same time as it took direct aim at Apple’s hardware throne.
Back in 2010, when Google released its first flagship smartphone, the Nexus, Apple was already on its fourth-generation iPhone. Google didn’t make Nexus phones itself—over the years, they were manufactured by the likes of HTC, Samsung, and LG—but they were the best way to experience Android as Google intended it to be used. (Carriers routinely install unnecessary apps, widgets, and skins on Android phones they sell.)
Apple had quite a head start on the design side. By seeing through the production of its phones from start to finish and meticulously designing the software that runs on them, it could tailor the user experience far more precisely than Google, working with a vast range of devices, ever could.
Google, on the other hand, had a big leg up on services. Between its search, email, maps, calendars, chat, and more recent offerings like Google Photos, even the most die-hard Apple fans spent—and still spend—a lot of their time on their iPhones using Google’s products.
In the intervening years, Apple took swipes at Google’s core competency. It made much-needed improvements to its iCloud services, while Siri brought digital assistants into the mainstream. Apple never quite caught up with Google’s offerings, but stayed close enough behind that the gap wasn’t enough to keep people from buying new iPhones.
Tuesday’s event was Google’s reply. The company is trying what Apple has done for years—creating both its software and hardware in-house—and the company’s executives aren’t shy about touting it. “We designed everything about Pixel, from the industrial design to the user experience,” said Rick Osterloh, Google’s senior vice president for hardware. “What really makes it come to life is how hardware and software come together.” Osterloh couldn’t resist a jab at Apple’s iPhones: “And there’s no unsightly camera bump!”
On the surface, the Pixel looks like it has a shot at rivaling the iPhone. Google says the phone’s camera is rated higher than the one in iPhone 7, and that a 15-minute charge can restore seven hours of battery life. (Until the benchmarks are in, we won’t know how the phones stack up against each other in terms of speed.)
And if the Pixel’s hardware measures up, its software offerings could make it the first device genuinely positioned to knock the iPhone off the premium-smartphone throne. It comes with unlimited, full-resolution backups for photos and 4K video, which promises to free up precious disk space, and thoroughly integrates Google Assistant, the company’s ever-evolving artificial-intelligence helper.
The Assistant’s onstage demos were impressive: It can extract requests from conversational questions, and follow up by asking for more information. (“What day would you like to make the reservation? What time? For how many?”) It seems far more useful than Siri, but still nowhere near perfect. Embarrassingly, it misheard one executive as he dictated a text to his wife in front of hundreds of thousands of viewers.
Building on its software edge, Google repeatedly emphasized another value that sets it apart from Apple: personalization. The company has tried to paint Apple as the brand for mindless conformists, which it contrasted Tuesday with the potential for artificial intelligence to “build a personal Google for each and every user.” Google has a staggering database of detailed information about its users, and it’s not afraid to use it. Location history, search patterns, voice queries, emails, and texts: With access to them all, the Assistant can piece together a pretty good picture of what a user is going to want to know next, perhaps even before it’s asked.
And that’s perhaps Google’s biggest split with Apple. Google isn’t afraid to scoop up more information about its users, because it thinks the users will end up feeling like they’re benefiting from giving it up. Some of the most impressive things its services can do—like proactively letting you know you should leave earlier than usual for your appointment across town, and maybe take an alternate route to avoid an accident on the interstate—only work with access to your location, your calendar, and real-time traffic data gathered from thousands of other Google Maps users.
Apple, on the other hand, is betting that consumers value their privacy enough that they’ll be willing to forgo some of Google’s fancier bells and whistles. It’s trying to prove it can still do interesting things with big data, and has invested in anonymity-preserving tricks like differential privacy that allow it to unleash machine-learning algorithms without being able to connect an individual’s sensitive data directly to them.
But as Google finds more and more ways to activate the data it’s carefully gathered over the years, the convenience it can offer may outweigh most people’s privacy concerns.
Even if the Pixel proves a capable smartphone, and Google’s services lure buyers willing to pay hundreds of dollars for a premium phone away from Apple, Google’s still got one more hurdle to clear: Improving the quality of the apps available on its Play Store. The Play Store recently overtook the iOS App Store in the number of apps it hosts, and the number of developers that make apps for it, but it’s still battling a reputation for lower-quality offerings.
But Tuesday’s announcement might just be the kind of sign developers needed that Google is getting even more serious about challenging Apple. As soon as app-makers feel like they might get left behind if they don’t support Android, too, they’ll start flooding the Play Store with more and better programs, perhaps nudging the Pixel within striking distance of the iPhone.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.