Stock photography, by its nature, traffics in cliches. The inventory of photos on sites like Getty and Shutterstock and iStockphoto exists to illustrate as wide a collection of stories as possible; the production incentives, for photographers and agencies alike, err toward mass appeal. As a result: We, as the images' end-users, get treated to collections like Women Laughing Alone With Salad. And Ladies Lounging (Uncomfortably) With Laptops. And Woman on Verge of Crushing Man With Shoe. Etc. The "woman" in many of these series is often clothed in a power suit and/or stilettos and/or nothing at all; in affect, she often seems sultry and/or angry and/or confused.
Stock photography and feminism, in other words, have traditionally been rather uncomfortable bedfellows. "If this is how feminism looks to the world," New York magazine recently put it, "maybe what a woman really needs is a stock agency of one's own."
Today, Getty is introducing a version of that agency: the "Lean In Collection," a series of 2,500 lady-images that substitute salad and stilettos for more positive props. The gallery, Mashable reports, will include a mixture of existing, Lean In-approved stock photos and new ones shot with a feminist mission in mind. It "includes positive images of women, families and even men." And it pays attention not only to clothing, but also to things like posture—and diversity.
Getty says it will add new images to the gallery each month. And while it's an open question how much change can be effected by the collection—whose images, after all, will be incorporated into stock photography's stiletto-saladed stew—it's a start. And, Getty says, it's a start that will be capitalizing on an existing trend. "Woman" is the most commonly searched term on its site, the agency says. In 2007, its top-selling return for that query was a woman sprawled on a bed, ostensibly naked under a sheet. Today, on the other hand, Getty's top-seller shows a woman riding a train, looking optimistically into the distance. She is fully clothed.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.