All this to say, e-readers have opened up a period of great innovation in how we convey and consume "books," but, as of yet, these new products have not met with the sorts of rigorous and routine reviews that new printed books receive. But a new project, Download the Universe, aims to change that. Led by a set of some of the top science writers in the country -- including Carl Zimmer, Steve Silberman, and Atlantic contributor David Dobbs -- the site aims to provide reviews of new straight-to-ebook science books. Carl Zimmer writes, introducing the project,
It is still tough for readers to discover new science ebooks. Traditional book reviews limit themselves to works on paper. Some ebooks may appear in computer magazines, but buried in reviews of laptops and printers. In between, we need a community.
Download the Universe is a step towards that community. It is the work of a group of writers and scientists who are deeply intrigued by the future of science books. (You can find our names and links to our web sites on the right.) Here we review science ebooks--broadly defined, except for ebooks that are just spin-offs of print books. We hope to build up a library of titles that curious readers can browse. Some reviews will be positive, others negative. We welcome your own judgments, and we look forward to vibrant (but civilized) discussions in the comment threads. We will also write essays from time to time about the changes that publishing is undergoing.
Of course, there are plenty of ebooks that aren't science books and therefore won't fall under Download the Universe's scrutiny, but of all the places to begin a project like this, science books seems like a fertile place to start. Science books naturally present a great opportunity for high-quality visual content -- whether virtual dissection, to-scale interactive maps of space or the oceans, or the ability to zoom way in on the tiny structures that make up a cell or a molecule. A recent review by Deborah Blum of Theodore Gray's The Elements demonstrates this perfectly. Blum writes:
I hate to admit this but for some time - okay, almost the two years since it was published - I cherished an attitude about Theodore Gray's dazzling e-tribute to the Periodic Table, The Elements. It was too jazzy, I told myself, too flashy. Of course, what I meant was that it was so successful.
It's easy to maintain that envy about The Elements even today. As The Wall Street Journal noted in a recent story on e-publishing, this virtuoso exploration of our chemical world remains "a runaway best-seller", selling more than 250,000 electronic copies and generating more than $2.5 million in income for Touch Press publishing.
But I'd like to here to get past author envy and take a serious look at what makes this publication so exceptionally successful - and, in fact, so exceptional. ...
Obviously, in its app-like format, Gray's publication emphasizes the visuals over text. It's enticely easy to play with the virtual iodine-laced chewing gum package and skim over the accompanying paragraphs. And that's too bad because if you take the time, the writing is terrific - funny, smart, knowledgeable, friendly. In his introduction, Gray writes: "The earth, this iPad, your foot - everything tangible - is made of the elements. Your foot is made mostly of oxygen, with quite a bit of carbon joining it, giving structure to the organic molecules that define you as an example of a carbon-based life form. (And if you're not a carbon based life form: Welcome to Earth....)." There were times when I found the text even more fun than the virtual elements.
This sort of review, and many of the others on Download the Universe, is an indication that ebooks are maturing as a genre. The conversation about what they are and whether they will destroy reading is subsiding (even the old guard at The New York Review of Books has jumped on the ebook bandwagon, as Alexis Madrigal pointed out recently), and now top reviewers are taking a look at them for their content, not their form. It's fitting too that this early effort at ebook criticism finds its home in the pages of the web, not the pages of a magazine or newspaper. The web takes its digital brethren seriously.