Why the Depression Was Good for Innovation in the Kitchen

In the 1930s, people were willing to pay for quality and corporate executives were comfortable with long-term perspectives

The New York Times Magazine blog has a charming post on the Depression-era origins of the iconic Bialetti Moka Express stovetop coffee maker.

In reality, though, its 1930s sales were relatively modest. According to Jeffrey T. Schnapp, "The Romance of Caffeine and Aluminum," in Critical Inquiry (2001) the Moka Express was actually a slow seller before the war, partly because aluminum was still expensive, though considered patriotic because Italy produced the metal from native bauxite.

There's actually an even more interesting lesson on the uses of adversity from the same period, the commercial espresso machine as we know it. According to the official Illy site:

The company's first fundamental invention dates back to the thirties: coffee pressurization in cans, which immediately allowed coffee to be shipped as far as the south of Italy, preserved and "aged" in tinplate cans.
In 1935, its founder Francesco Illy invented the illetta, the first coffee machine with automatic water dosing and a jet of compressed air - the predecessor of all espresso machines.

For connoisseurs of resilience as well as coffee, it gets even better. Illy was not Italian by birth, but a Hungarian who made his fortune after his adopted originally Austro-Hungarian home town of Trieste was annexed by Italy after World War I. (Dislocation can be good for creativity; Trieste also helped inspire James Joyce, when he could not obtain a Berlitz teaching position farther west.)

U.S. food innovation also flourished during the 1930s, which gave us the Zeroll aluminum ice cream scoop, the flexible drinking straw (see the excellent Lemelson Center page), the Melitta filter cone as we know it, Teflon for cookware, and improved, incredibly durable uncoated pots and pans from Guardian Ware, Revere Ware, and other companies.

This surprisingly strong record isn't isolated. At conferences of business and technology historians I've been attending over the last year, one of the hottest topics has been the technological fertility of the 1930s. One scholar, the economist Alexander Field, has even called the decade A Great Leap Forward in a new book with that title.

One neglected reason for the Depression's strides is the willingness of people at that time to pay for quality, and corporate executives' and entrepreneurs' willingness to take long-term perspectives. That Zeroll ice cream scoop sold for $2.25 when a copy of the New York Times and a NY subway token were a nickle. Rubbermaid was founded with a rubber dust pan selling for $1.00 when conventional models were $0.39. Fortune magazine sold for $1.00 an issue and had 30,000 advance subscribers.The thirties had nasty, brutish, racist aspects that are all too familiar, but people also had a strong belief in value, keeping their new technology and periodicals alive for better days.

Image: Wikimedia Commons.

About the Author

Edward Tenner is a historian of technology and culture, and an affiliate of the Center for Arts and Cultural Policy at Princeton's Woodrow Wilson School. He was a founding advisor of Smithsonian's Lemelson Center.

Twitter

Conservatives once warned that Obamacare would produce the Democratic Waterloo. Their inability to accept the principle of universal coverage has, instead, led to their own defeat.

Seven years and three days ago, the House of Representatives grumblingly voted to approve the Senate’s version of the Affordable Care Act. Democrats in the House were displeased by many of the changes introduced by Senate Democrats. But in the interval after Senate passage, the Republicans had gained a 41st seat in the Senate. Any further tinkering with the law could trigger a Republican filibuster. Rather than lose the whole thing, the House swallowed hard and accepted a bill that liberals regarded as a giveaway to insurance companies and other interest groups. The finished law proceeded to President Obama for signature on March 23, 2010.

A few minutes after the House vote, I wrote a short blog post for the website I edited in those days. The site had been founded early in 2009 to argue for a more modern and more moderate form of Republicanism. The timing could not have been worse. At precisely the moment we were urging the GOP to march in one direction, the great mass of conservatives and Republicans had turned on the double in the other, toward an ever more wild and even paranoid extremism. Those were the days of Glenn Beck’s 5 o’clock Fox News conspiracy rants, of Sarah Palin’s “death panels,” of Orly Taitz and her fellow Birthers, of Tea Party rallies at which men openly brandished assault rifles.