Anonymous's and LulzSec's Overlapping, FBI-Thwarting Pasts

This article is from the archive of our partner .

Anonymous and LulzSec are planning something called "Payload #1" for Friday. It's the first major event for the two hacking groups' new activist-oriented collaboration, Operation Anti-Security, or AntiSec. But in a roundabout way, it's sort of a reunion for the two groups.

In a sprawling exposé out Thursday, The Wall Street Journal explains how the two groups trace their roots back to 2003 and prank-planning on 4chan, an anonymous image forum where the shenanigans of a small group of users got out of control. That collective became known publicly as Anonymous after an attack on the Church of Scientology made headlines. Following other high-profile hacks on PayPal, Sony and HBGary, an internet security firm that was secretly investigating WikiLeaks, a splinter group calling themselves LulzSec emerged with a more voracious appetite for aggressive assaults on major corporations and banks as well as national governments and spy agencies. Their ruthless and apparently unrelenting attacks on any secure target they deem laughable--"Lulz" stands for laughs, "Sec" for security--launched the group into the global media spotlight. Just after LulzSec announced joining forces formally with their old pals at Anonymous, kids started getting arrested.

Earlier this week, British police took into custody a suspected LulzSec ringleader named Ryan Cleary. The 16-year-old had been connected to hacking into the encrypted chatrooms of Anonymous, which then published his contact information, surely a strong lead for investigators scrambling to find anybody connected with the hacker groups. Though the media eagerly linked Cleary to LulzSec after police drew the connection to Anonymous, both groups have denied that Cleary held a leadership role. This arrest follows that of 19-year-old Martijn Gonlag, the hacker featured in WSJ's history of Anonymous, who admits to have taken part in attacks last year. Since his December arrest, Gonlag has grown disenchanted. Gonlag and other say the group's decentralized nature is a problem for everyone.

"People are starting to realize that Anonymous is a loose cannon," Gonlag told The Journal. Other sources told the paper that Anonymous is really more of "an idea" than a formal organization. This is a big problem for the law enforcement agencies trying to find the culprits in the many recent attacks on companies and governments. The groups are primarily young males--from teenagers to men in their early thirties--and many suspect the leadership of each to be five to ten that communicate over encrypted chats. "There is no one group, no one website," another Anonymous collaborator Gregg Housh said. "That is what makes it so powerful in my eyes."

The reunion of LulzSec and Anonymous could provide police with clues that could lead to more arrests. But as hacking expert and New York University professor Gabriella Coleman told The Journal, it doesn't really matter. "There are nodes of power and authority, but it is pretty decentralized, and no one is calling the shots for all the operations."

It sounds like the multi-headed Hydra. In Greek mythology, Hercules had to kill the Hydra as one of his Twelve Labors, but this proved challenging, as every time he cut off one of the heads, another would grow in his place. Eventually, he realized that burning the stumps closed to stop it from regenerating. The F.B.I. so far looks hardly Herculean, though. A Tuesday raid on a server bank in Virginia so far succeeded only in knocking out service to the Curbed Network and Instapaper. LulzSec tweeted after the fact, "Best watch out, they can't get us, so they're going after people they think might know us. Defend yourselves."

This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.

About the Author

Adam Clark Estes is a former writer for The Wire. He has also written for The Huffington Post and Vice.

Twitter

The President Trump is reportedly considering drastic action to end the Russia investigation.

Why do Donald Trump and his advisors keep floating the possibility of firing Robert Mueller, an act that would spark the greatest constitutional crisis since Watergate, perhaps the greatest in modern American history?

Partly, it’s simple rage. Mueller threatens Trump. And when Trump sees someone as a threat, he tries to discredit and destroy them—conventional norms of propriety, decency and legality be damned.

But there’s another, more calculated, reason. Trump and his advisors may genuinely believe that firing Mueller is a smart move. And if you put morality aside, and see the question in nakedly political terms, they may be right.

The chances that Mueller will uncover something damning seem very high. Trump has already admitted to firing former FBI Director James Comey over the Russia investigation. Donald Trump Jr. has already admitted to welcoming the opportunity to get dirt on Hillary Clinton from people he believed were representatives of the Russian government. Even if Mueller doesn’t accuse anyone of a crime, he’s likely to paint a brutal picture. And that’s just on the question of election collusion and obstruction of justice. If Mueller uses Russia to segue into Trump’s business dealings, who knows what he might find. An all-star team of legal and financial sleuths, with unlimited time and money, and the ability to subpoena documents and people, have been let loose on the affairs of a man whose own autobiographer called him a “sociopath.” No wonder Trump is scared.