Decades after the genius' death, the question of who controls his publicity rights continues. Even his prodigious imagination could not predict the media world of the early 21st century.


Albert Einstein was many things, including the co-inventor of a refrigerator. (Contrary to an earlier Atlantic report, he was almost certainly not moonlighting as a blouse designer in 1936. The Social Security Death Index lists five other candidates, two from New York City as in the cited design patent, while Einstein resided in Princeton, New Jersey.)

Economically, though, Einstein today is among other things a dead celebrity, one of the men and women who generate tens of millions of dollars annually for -- whom? Here's where the law is becoming increasingly opaque. Einstein's granddaughter Evelyn, who died last week, was suing the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HUJ) for a share of the income to save herself from destitution. As the articles reproduced here report, Evelyn did not claim any of the literary property bequeathed to HUJ in Albert Einstein's last will, only a share of licensing fees. The law governing so-called "publicity rights" -- permission to use name and image -- is notoriously murky. It's governed by state, not federal law, as copyrights are. Some states, like California, have guaranteed it; others have excluded it or, like New Jersey, are treating it as "common law," whatever that might mean in this case. Because dead celebrities and their executors may have lived in several states, the complications are mind-boggling, and there's a strong case for federal regulation.

Einstein's last will is a public document in New Jersey. There's no mention of what later came to be known as publicity rights. Meanwhile publishers and writers have been driven up the wall, as my former Princeton University Press author, the physicist Tony Rothman, explains. It's all especially strange because Einstein was highly sophisticated about his image and its value in advancing causes he believed in. Even his prodigious imagination evidently could not predict the media world of the early 21st century, or the powers of Photoshopped pastiche exploited by GM (its advertising agency licensed the photographer's rights) now being sued by HUJ.

Image credits: Wikimedia Commons.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to