The other night I was watching Copyright Criminals, a documentary new to Hulu about hip hop producers' legal trials and tribulations. Beyond being an excellent tour through mid-80s rap, the film argues that the rights regime wrapped around music is FUBAR. And it's so damaged because it never anticipated the way people think about music in an age of infinite and cheap reproducibility.
That's probably not news to you, but I hadn't thought of the implications for developers of music applications. They are likely to be tripped up by the same rights problems that landed De La Soul in court unless someone figures out how to enable innovation legally.
The Echo Nest is one company working on the problem. They described their approach in a talk at the Berkman Center for the Internet and Society at Harvard this week. I spoke with their CEO Jim Lucchese.
The company has a database not unlike Pandora's, Lucchese said, but it's created algorithmically, not by musicians. They also monitor blogs and Tweets for mentions of bands and songs. This allows them to amass data about millions of songs.
Which is nice, but it's not the whole story. It turns out that for any music application to be useful, you need, well, you need the music. So, a big part of The Echo Nest's business model is to act as a broker between the music companies and music app developers. The developers access that content through an API that acts as a sort of extension of the current (broken) rights regime.