Reader responses to this recent item, arguing that Bing was not yet closing the gap on Google.
1) A reader whose first name is Yong suggests this control-group test:
For reasons unknown, I've personally found that the results from the "Bing vs Google" services can sometimes differ markedly from the actual results presented by Bing and Google at their respective websites. The actual results themselves are also sometimes affected by whether you're logged in with your Windows Live or Google account, again for reasons unknown to me. It would be interesting if you could retry your experiment to see if you obtain different results, and post a follow-up if you do.
Interesting. Naturally I have tried a half-dozen searches just now with three tabs simultaneously open -- to Bing.com, Google.com, and Bing-vs-Google.com. So far I find that Bing-vs-Google.com "works." That is, its combined display shows the same results as the two separate sites. It doesn't mean there won't be variations - and I haven't spent time trying a bunch of exotic tests. But in a first pass no anomalies turned up.
2) Another reader, whose first name is Samuel, says if anything I under-emphasized the sophistication gap between Bing and Google:
Here's a huge difference in the two search engines. They both have auto-suggest -- the drop-downs that now appear as soon as you start typing, which are so great that we're now taking them completely for granted. But Google's actually goes a second level.
Try typing in "Roger Ebert" on both and you get roughly similar suggestions. However, right after "Roger Ebert," keep typing and Google will offer further suggestions -- and related suggestions. In this case in my screenshots, these are Roger Ebert's actual movie reviews. Bing just stops after "Roger Ebert". The mechanics allowing that show a far more sophisticated algorithm on Google's end.
Samuel (who says he has no connection to Google) goes on:
Not to flatter Google too much, but it seems that, just as their search algorithm is more complicated than any one person can grasp, so the task of showcasing how well it works is too full of little, tiny nuances to allow for a simple promotion. Hence -- other than that background-image kerfuffle -- they never came out with "Google 2.0" in response to Bing; they just continued their incremental improvements, often on features that aren't prominent at all, that have added up to something akin to "Google 4.0" compared with Google from, say, 2000.
After the jump, further explanation about why the Bing results turned up several ads for "DUI Insurance" when I was trying to find out about airplane crashes.
3) A reader whose first name is Eric points out that in many states -- here is an example from California -- after a DUI conviction, drivers need a special kind of insurance coverage, often involving a "SR-22 Form." So a search for "Cirrus SR-22 crashes" turned up "targeted" ads on Bing, though not on Google, for companies selling this kind of coverage. FWIW.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.