This kind of eloquence is different from what I think of as rhetorical prettiness -- words and phrases that catch your notice as you hear them, and that often can be quoted, remembered, and referred to long afterwards. "Ask not..." from John F. Kennedy. "Blood, toil, tears, and sweat" from Winston Churchill. "Only thing we have to fear is fear itself" from FDR. "I have a dream," from Martin Luther King. Or, to show that memorable language does not necessarily mean elevated thought, "segregation today, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever!" from the early George C. Wallace.
At rare moments in history, language that goes beyond prettiness to beauty is matched with original, serious, difficult thought to produce the political oratory equivalent of Shakespeare. By acclamation Lincoln's Second Inaugural Address is the paramount American achievement of this sort: "With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness
in the right as God gives us to see the right..."
The reason to distinguish eloquence of thought from prettiness of expression is that the former tells you something important about the speaker, while the latter may or may not do so. Hired assistants can add a fancy phrase, much as gag writers can supply a joke. Not even his greatest admirers considered George W. Bush naturally expressive, but in his most impressive moment, soon after the 9/11 attacks, he delivered a speech full of artful writerly phrases, eg: "Whether we bring our enemies to justice or bring justice to our
enemies, justice will be done." Good for him, and good for his staff.
Rhetorical polish, that is, can be a staff-enhanced virtue. The eloquence that comes from original thought is much harder to hire, or to fake. This is the sort of eloquence we've seen from Obama often enough to begin to expect.
The passages that struck me from this speech were the same ones Andrew Sullivan just highlighted:
I do not
suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away. No
matter how much we may want to fudge it - indeed, while we know that
the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even
contradictory - the fact is that at some level, the views of the two
camps are irreconcilable.
This is not "pretty" as language. "Fudge it"??? But it is surprisingly honest as thought.
In this world of competing claims about
what is right and what is true, have confidence in the values with
which you've been raised and educated. Be unafraid to speak your mind
when those values are at stake. Hold firm to your faith and allow it to
guide you on your journey. Stand as a lighthouse.
remember too that the ultimate irony of faith is that it necessarily
admits doubt. It is the belief in things not seen. It is beyond our
capacity as human beings to know with certainty what God has planned
for us or what He asks of us, and those of us who believe must trust
that His wisdom is greater than our own.
This doubt should
not push us away from our faith. But it should humble us. It should
temper our passions, and cause us to be wary of self-righteousness. It
should compel us to remain open, and curious, and eager to continue the
moral and spiritual debate that began for so many of you within the
walls of Notre Dame. And within our vast democracy, this doubt should
remind us to persuade through reason, through an appeal whenever we can
to universal rather than parochial principles, and most of all through
an abiding example of good works, charity, kindness, and service that
moves hearts and minds.
I challenge you to find a sentence there that will be remembered, "I have a dream"-style. But the thought, complete with non-politician-like emphasis on "irony" and "doubt," is an important one, and not likely staff-borne.