But scientists haven’t yet nailed down observational evidence for this effect. “There’s a long battle within the community to try to understand the connection between black holes and star formation,” said Ignacio Martín-Navarro, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California at Santa Cruz.
To investigate that connection, Martín-Navarro and his colleagues recently analyzed massive galaxies and the supermassive black holes that reside in their centers. They found that black holes are indeed responsible for the quenching of galaxies, and that the mass of a black hole influences how quickly that quenching occurs.
Galaxies with more massive black holes became quenched earlier and faster than did galaxies with less massive black holes. The galaxies with bigger black holes experienced more intense rates of star formation in the beginning, during the early universe, than did the ones with smaller black holes. But galaxies with smaller black holes kept producing stars longer, presumably because their black holes weren’t powerful enough to blow away star-making gas and dust. For this reason, galaxies with smaller black holes tend to have a younger population of stars.
The findings were published Monday in a paper in Nature. Martín-Navarro and his team studied the light from a sample of galaxies by splitting it into different wavelengths—a frequently used method in astrophysics that can reveal important properties of astrophysical objects, like the ages of stars. This allowed them to trace the history of star formation in each galaxy, then compare this information with the masses of the black holes at the galaxies’ centers. The mass of a black hole served as a proxy for the amount of energy that gets spewed into the galaxy. The bigger the black hole, the more energy unleashed, the quicker the quenching.
The findings leave some mysteries untouched. Scientists still don’t know how a hungry, feasting black hole spits out star-quenching energy, a process known as feedback. The new research “does seem to give a firm indication of what the effect of black-hole feedback is, even if it doesn’t fill in all the gaps in our knowledge of exactly how the quenching process works,” said Caleb Scharf, the director of the Columbia Astrobiology Center in New York, in an email.
“Bottom line is that the relationship of black-hole mass to galactic stellar populations has been a problem staring us in the face for well over a decade, so any progress toward better quantifying the phenomenon is extremely welcome,” Scharf said.
Martín-Navarro said other research has attempted to find a connection between star formation and the brightness of an AGN, but with little success, perhaps because star formation occurs over longer periods of time than do AGN bursts, which can turn on and off. “It’s really hard to compare things in really different timescales,” Martín-Navarro said.
Although supermassive black holes measure more than 1 million times more massive than the sun, they are practically tiny compared to the galaxies they live in, Martín-Navarro said. Despite their “small” size, black holes influence how galaxies grow and evolve in big ways. It’s as if a single cell in the human body determined the direction of an entire life. That’s what fascinates Martín-Navarro the most—that something so small can dictate the future of something so much bigger.