The notoriously quiet Supreme Court justice has had a far-reaching influence on the personnel of the Trump administration, which may be his most lasting legacy.
The president lamented bills that would allow “a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments from birth” in his State of the Union address.
A lawsuit to block the border wall could go the route the House GOP took in 2014 to challenge Obamacare.
With his solution to the border-wall impasse, the president seems to be working within the boundaries of law—revealing the massive power of the American executive.
The senator said she will vote to confirm the judge in part because she thinks abortion rights in America are safe.
The justice stayed far away from the Brett Kavanaugh controversy in an interview on Thursday.
Local- and state-level leaders across the country say they’re ready to lash out against Democrats in the midterm elections.
Rachel Mitchell may be laying the groundwork for future investigations with her interrogation of Christine Blasey Ford.
Anti-abortion legal advocates in Washington, D.C., are sticking with him, but outside of the Beltway, women’s views are more ambiguous.
After a week of political theater in the Senate Judiciary Committee, President Trump’s nominee is back where he started: on his way to the Supreme Court.
The Supreme Court hearings are a preview of the party’s midterm strategy, with lawmakers placing the issue front and center. But it’s far from clear that their apocalyptic rhetoric will actually work.
The Supreme Court nominee has become a symbol of the president’s quiet judicial legacy and the anti-Trump resistance.
Representative Justin Amash is the sole member of Congress who's come out against the Supreme Court nominee, citing his record on privacy. Can he get Senator Rand Paul to join him?
Modern Supreme Court nominees never discuss how they feel about specific cases. Chuck Schumer believes that should change when President Trump’s pick faces the Senate.
Trump's Supreme Court pick faces a brutal nomination fight ahead.
The 5-4 ruling in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis could weaken workplace protections—and the justices on both sides knew it.
The Supreme Court considered whether lawyers can decide what is best for clients and ignore their wishes.
Two cases offer very different solutions to a perennial problem of politicians attempting to cement themselves in power.
The Supreme Court is set to hear a case over California’s regulation of “crisis pregnancy centers,” which try to talk their clients out of ending their pregnancies.
The Supreme Court justice talks about sexual harassment, gender discrimination, and the cases she’d like to see overturned.