The Supreme Court considers a case involving a youth on the Mexican side of the border killed by an American border patrol agent on the U.S. side.
Presidents have thought before that they could roll those wimpy-looking nerds with their gavels and robes. It usually doesn’t work out all that well.
The outcome of the battle over Trump’s travel ban focused on seven mostly Muslim nations is hard to predict.
Senators should press Neil Gorsuch on questions fundamental to democratic government.
How will Republicans respond if Democrats attempt to filibuster President Trump’s Supreme Court nominee?
The president’s executive order threatening to deny federal funds to jurisdictions that don’t help the feds deport undocumented immigrants reads like it was drafted by Lionel Hutz.
The Supreme Court will examine two cases that could tell us how the conservative justices feel about the president-elect’s plan for mass deportations.
The Supreme Court considers whether states that charge inmates with fees and restitution have to return that money if their convictions are set aside.
The High Court will hear two cases related to a crucial issue––how states draw their legislative districts.
The Supreme Court will consider whether Texas’s outdated standard on intellectual disability and executions violates the constitutional prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.
The president-elect’s answer on abortion is telling, if contradictory.
Defying the tenor of the 2016 election, during a case over the president’s power to appoint temporary heads of agencies, the Supreme Court tries to function as it should.
An upcoming birthright citizenship case at the Supreme Court could give some insight as to whether Donald Trump’s proposed ban on immigration could pass Constitutional muster.
It’s the issue many conservatives care about most—but when Clinton blew an answer at the debate, the Republican nominee didn’t even seem to notice.
A group of non-citizens detained after the 9/11 terrorist attacks claim officials violated their constitutional rights, but the result in the case isn’t likely to be in their favor.
Conservative justices might be the party’s final bulwark against a changing electoral landscape.
The Supreme Court will hear the case of a Latino man convicted after racist sentiments were allegedly expressed during deliberations, but longstanding rules about juries would prevent him from getting a new day in court.
As the Supreme Court prepares to reconvene next week, the justices agreed to hear eight new cases on Thursday.
A man’s life hinges on the Supreme Court’s evaluation of racist testimony during his sentencing.
The Republican candidate successfully wooed Ted Cruz by releasing an expanded list of potential justices.