“But there are answers to all these questions and I will continue to provide those answers, and those answers have been confirmed and affirmed by the State Department and by other government officials, and eventually I will get to testify in public, and I am sure it will be a long and grueling time there, but all the questions will be answered, and I take responsibility and it wasn’t the best choice,” Clinton added.
Still, while Clinton said she was sorry about the confusion that the arrangement has caused people, that came after she twice deflected questions from Mitchell about whether she was “sorry” about using a private email system, initially saying that she now wished that she had made a different choice, and the second time replying: “It wasn’t the best choice, and I certainly have said that.”
She reiterated her campaign’s message that none of the messages that crossed her server were marked as classified when they were sent or received, and said that she was careful with the handling of classified information while at State.
The ongoing federal review of the roughly 30,000 of her messages under the Freedom of Information Act has led officials to redact information now deemed classified in 188 released messages so far.
Clinton has said she used her private email system for “convenience” because it allowed her to avoid carrying one device for personal emails and a second for work-related correspondence.
On Friday she said she did not consider the topic carefully when she became secretary of State in 2009. Asked if anyone in her inner circle cautioned against the email arrangement, Clinton replied: “You know, I was not thinking a lot when I got in. There was so much work to be done, we had so many problems around the world. I didn't really stop and think, what kind of email system will there be.”
Clinton last month agreed to have the server turned over to the FBI, which is probing the security of her private email setup.
Clinton’s comments arrive amid fresh political warfare on the GOP-led House panel probing her email arrangement.
Rep. Adam Schiff, a Democratic member of the House Benghazi panel, penned a New York Times op-ed that calls for the dissolution of the committee, calling it a partisan tool to attack Clinton’s White House candidacy.
“A committee that cannot tell the American people what it is looking for after 16 months should be shut down. Otherwise, Benghazi will come to be remembered not for the tragedy that claimed four American lives, but for the terrible abuse of process that now bears its name,” writes Schiff, who is the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
That drew a lengthy, sharply worded rebuke from Jamal Ware, the committee spokesman for Trey Gowdy, the South Carolina Republican who leads the panel. Ware said Schiff’s call for disbanding the committee lacks credibility.