Fighting Over the Founders: How We Remember the American Revolution, by Andrew M. Schocket (New York University Press, 2015)
What It's About
Fighting Over the Founders examines the ongoing clash over the meaning of the American Revolution. Schocket sorts the camps into "essentialists," who view the Founders as visionary "demigods," creators of "a legacy from which straying would be treason"; and "organicists," who "believe that Americans are ever in the process of trying to complete a Revolution that the founders left unfinished." He then details how this tug-of-war over our national origin story plays out in politics, entertainment, academia, and institutions such as museums.
Target D.C. Audience
Historians, speechwriters, museum curators, tour guides, documentarians, constitutional law experts, dog-whistle decoders, plus self-reflective tea-party activists and anyone else who might claim the mantle of the Founders.
"Let's not fight, they suggest, let's share the nation's founding symbols. But I think that we should continue to debate the nation's origins. At least the American Revolution gives us a common set of characters, settings, and events. That civic vocabulary allows for debate through a rhetorical shorthand. The point in a democracy is not for us to agree on everything. But we can have discussions if at least we're speaking the same conceptual language."
To Be Sure
Schocket is forthright about his liberal bias, so it is not surprising that he tends to be more critical of essentialism, the view he argues conservatives are more likely to hold, than he is of organicism, a perspective he says is more commonly found on the left.
One Level Deeper
The book's first chapter is a veritable glossary of founding-era quotes and how they've been used on the stump by members of both parties. This could be a valuable tool for speechwriters. As Schocket notes, "Quoting the founders represents a strong rhetorical gambit, reflecting the assumption that no one can gainsay Jefferson on the meaning of the Declaration of Independence." Journalists and others looking to decode the rhetoric might also find it useful.
Among the more telling revelations: Republicans have used the phrase "Founding Fathers" four times as often as their Democratic counterparts since 1968, while Democrats have overwhelmingly stuck to "a more perfect union" and "created equal" when echoing the founding generation.
The Big Takeaway
The American Revolution isn't the national unifier it might seem to be—and you can learn a lot about someone's politics by how they think and talk about it.
This article is from the archive of our partner National Journal.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.
Zach Cohen is a web producer for National Journal Hotline. Before joining National Journal in 2014, he interned at The Washington Post, Time Magazine, USA Today and PBS MediaShift and wrote about politics and government for New Voices. Zach was born and raised in New Jersey and got his bachelor's degree in international relations from American University, where he served as editor-in-chief of The Eagle, the school newspaper.