The abuse of "filibuster threats" over the past six years has inured us all to the power -- and legitimacy -- of a "real" filibuster.
I am no fan of the way routine minority obstructionism has made 60 votes, rather than the constitutional requirement of a simple majority of 51, the standard for getting anything whatsoever through the Senate. But I have to respect the way the junior senator from Kentucky, Rand Paul, took the floor for 13 hours yesterday to mount a genuine filibuster to the nomination of John Brennan as CIA director*, and to raise questions about the unchecked life-and-death power President Obama has asserted in the open-ended "war on terror."
For more on the substance of Rand Paul's filibuster, see Conor Friedersdorf's summary. Even more important, in my view (since it affects a broader range of public business), is the potential of Paul's demonstration to shame Kentucky's senior senator and his colleagues who have indulged the lazy and destructive practice of fake filibusters. As Dave Weigel reported last night in Slate:
"If a person's going to make a stand on a nomination, this is the way to do it--the way Sen. Paul is doing it," [Oregon senator Jeff] Merkley said. "The American people can watch this and weigh in on whether he's a hero or a bum. That's reasonable. That honors the traditions of the Senate."
Merkley contrasted that with the filibuster that happened right before Paul's speech, one that got perfunctory media attention. For the third time, Democrats tried to advance the nomination of Caitlin Halligan to a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. For the third time she got a majority of "aye" votes but couldn't break the 60-vote cloture threshold.
"That took no time or energy from any member," Merkley said. "It had no impact on the American people. It had no accountability. From the time that leadership struck its deal on the filibuster, they talked about the need for comity. And what we've seen since then is a 100 percent, all-out effort to paralyze this body.
This is the way to do it. In the less than 12 hours since Paul finished his filibuster, this may already have become a banal point, but it's worth re-stating: We've had a reminder of what's wrong with the way the Senate usually does its business, or avoids doing so. A good moment for Rand Paul.
(Photo from last fall, source here.)
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.