This article is from the archive of our partner .

On Thursday a high-level staffer for Congresswoman Michele Bachmann's failed presidential campaign issued a press release alleging that Bachmann's finance chairman refuses to pay a number of former staffers because they declined to sign a non-disclosure agreement that "prohibits any discussion of any criminal, moral, and/or unethical behavior witnessed during Mrs. Bachmann's campaign in Iowa." That's a not-quite-veiled allusion, Salon suggests, to allegations that the Bachmann campaign illegally accessed a list of Iowa-area homeschooling families and emailed them solicitations. Bachmann's campaign responded to Waldron's claims by denying them:

Mr Waldren’s presentation of the facts and related allegations are false and inaccurate. Why Mr Waldren would be motivated to attempt to disparage the Congresswoman, the campaign, or fellow campaign members I can’t explain.

The campaign acknowledged a handful of outstanding invoices, and said that it's paid off "in excess of 90% of [Bachmann's] Presidential Campaign debt," but elided any mention of the non-disclosure agreements it supposedly asked staffers to sign. And, if you read the PR-ese closely enough, the campaign isn't denying any of the allegations — just former Bachmann for President National Field Coordinator Peter Waldron's "presentation" of them.

This would not be the first time Bachmann staffers have clashed with the law — Waldron himself was detained in Uganda, in 2006, for carrying an assault rifle. Nor would it be the campaign's first public spat: Bachmann has a well-documented history of alienating staffers. (In October 2011, her New Hampshire campaign staff quit en masse.)

This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.