A playful interactive app analyzes the presidential debates to tell you if the candidates sound like liars.
"We wanted to offer a tool for people to objectively look at the debates, as opposed to deal with pundits, who come on immediately after and with no data tell you who won or lost the debate," John Rothenberg explains in this short video from the Creators Project. His emphasis -- "with no data!" -- is indignant. Rothenberg and the rest of the team at Sosolimited, an art and technology studio founded by a group of MIT grads, decided to build an interactive web app to provide a radically different perspective on the debates.
ReConstitution 2012 is a dizzying display of animated typography, color-coded words splashing across a web page as the debate progresses. You can follow the first debate in real time, fast forward (x2) or super fast forward (x10). The program runs a statistical analysis of Obama and Romney's words to highlight those associated with positive and negative emotions, or even lying. Click on "stats" to compare the candidates on "positivity" or "shit they repeat" -- words like "tax" and "small business," of course. The candidates are also placed on a sliding scale from "truthy" to "deceptive," based on how much their language patterns match those statistically associated with lying or telling the truth. Using "we" instead of "I," for example, is supposedly a sign of deception.