As I mentioned a few months ago, Common Cause is taking legal action against the filibuster, arguing that its recent abuse rises to the level of unconstitutional power-grab. When our site's "categories" feature, now temporarily broken, is back up and running, I'll link to previous posts on this theme. For now, here's a chart from Common Cause showing how often the filibuster has been threatened or imposed over the past century:

FilibusterCommonCause.png


Yesterday Common Cause filed briefs and documents with the U.S. District Court in Washington to support its anti-filibuster case. The main brief is here; a supporting exhibit is here; and a list of related documents is here. I Am Not a Lawyerâ„¢, although I did study law for a year. Still, this argument is mainly historical, common-sensical, and accessible to non-lawyer readers. Here are the main points in its assertion that the Senate's "Rule XXIII" -- the provision under which most current filibusters occur -- violates the spirit and intent of the framers of the Constitution:
  • First, the Framers experienced the negative effects of supermajority voting under the Articles of Confederation;
  • Second, the 60 vote requirement conflicts with the intent of the Framers;
  • Third, the 60 vote requirement conflicts with the Quorum Clause
  • Fourth, the 60 vote requirement short-circuits the "single, finely wrought procedure" in the Presentment Clause for the passage of laws by the "prescribed majority of ... both Houses;
  • Fifth, the 60 vote requirement is invalid because it conflicts with the exclusive list of exceptions to majority rule in the Constitution;
  • Sixth, the 60 vote requirement upsets the balance in the Great Compromise;
  • Seventh, Rule V in combination with Rule XXII prohibits the Senate from amending its rules by majority vote and is unconstitutional
For what is meant by each of these terms of art, I direct you to the brief itself. We are witnessing a de facto amendment/hijacking of the Constitution whose effect is to make our democracy dysfunctional. It is worth noting and supporting efforts to fight back.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.