Many voters love Rick Santorum's positions, but they're ready to settle for Romney's superior organization and presumed electability.
COLUMBUS, Ohio - On the surface, Ohio looks like a toss-up between Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney. Polls published on Sunday show the two White House contenders in a dead heat for Super Tuesday's most symbolically important state.
But the ostensible parity belies an unmistakable conviction among Buckeye State voters and state GOP strategists alike that the former Massachusetts governor has the advantage here Tuesday, despite trailing in some surveys by double-digits only weeks ago. They say that Romney's superior organization, his television ad campaign and his message discipline -- coupled with Santorum's mistakes -- could help him overcome his early deficit and eke out a win, just as he did on Feb. 28 in Michigan, where he also trailed in the polls.
"Ohio is tracking what Gov. Romney has done in other states," said Jon Husted, the Republican secretary of state, who is unaffiliated in the presidential race. "Romney comes into state leading up to the election and unloads the cannons, and you see he generates momentum. That model they have employed in other states is what they're doing here, and it's seemingly having the same effect."
- The Culture-Warrior Evolution of the Santorums
- Obama's Rightrope on the Oil Reserve
- Playing the Hawk-in-Chief on Iran
Romney also has history on his side: Picking the establishment-friendly Romney over the insurgent Santorum would be typical of Ohio, a state with a relatively centrist GOP. Only 44 percent of its voters identified as evangelicals in the 2008 Republican presidential primary, according to exit polls, a far lower percentage than in states like Iowa and South Carolina. That is why John McCain, who had already effectively sewn up the nomination, beat challenger Mike Huckabee here four years ago by nearly 2-to-1.