Despite a huge fundraising advantage and about a four-year head start in campaigning, Mitt Romney has spent the whole year being outshined by a series of rivals for the Republican presidential nomination. Rick Perry, however, is the first one to beat him in national polls. What's Romney's problem? It could be that he sucks at politics. The sudden rise of Perry has got everyone offering poor old Romney unsolicited advice on how to get better.
How can Romney take Perry down? His campaign reportedly wants to portray Perry as a career politician who's too soft on immigration and too conservative on everything else. But everyone on the Internet thinks that strategy is bad. US News's Scott Galupo writes that Romney can't campaign to Perry's left and his right at the same time. And the National Review wrote that the "career pol" charge won't stick either, since Romney's been running for president since 2006. Conservative writer Jonathan Last agrees:
"...Romney would have been a career politician too, if only voters would have let him. He’s been running since 1994. His real gripe about Perry is actually, 'Hey, that guy wins all the time! No fair!'"
Last explains that Romney's real problem is that he's just bad at politics. His biggest political victories were losing by only 17 points to Ted Kennedy in 1994 after spending $7 million of his own money, and winning the 2002 Massachusetts governor's race--with just 49.77 percent of the vote. "Even in the biggest win of his life, he couldn't capture more than 50% of the vote," Last writes. And every time he runs, Romney adopts a different persona--the technocrat first, then he hard-line conservative. Romney has "no constituency because he's not very good at campaigning and, as the electoral results of the last 17 years have shown, voters don’t like him very much." How can Romney fix that?