Liberal senators and congressmen fought for the public option's inclusion in health care reform almost until the very end of the legislative process, adding signatures to a letter backing it in the weeks before the bill passed. But former Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, in an interview with ThinkProgress's Igor Volsky, seems to suggest that the public option was understood to be out of the picture much earlier.
DASCHLE: I don't think it was taken off the table completely. It was taken off the table as a result of the understanding that people had with the hospital association, with the insurance (AHIP), and others. I mean I think that part of the whole effort was based on a premise. That premise was, you had to have the stakeholders in the room and at the table. Lessons learned in past efforts is that without the stakeholders' active support rather than active opposition, it's almost impossible to get this job done. They wanted to keep those stakeholders in the room and this was the price some thought they had to pay. Now, it's debatable about whether all of these assertions and promises are accurate, but that was the calculation. I think there is probably a good deal of truth to it. You look at past efforts and the doctors and the hospitals, and the insurance companies all opposed health care reform. This time, in various degrees of enthusiasm, they supported it. And if I had to point out some of the key differences between then and now, it would be the most important examples of the difference.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.