ClaudeB asks: "If Dubya decides to go in Iran before Jan. 20, 2009, is there anyone in Washington who can stop him, since even the Joint Chiefs have trouble restraining him?"
I get asked this question now and again, and as best I can tell it's not a very difficult question -- if Bush orders air strikes against Iranian targets, nobody can stop him. A plain reading of the text of the US Constitution would seem to suggest that it would be unconstitutional for the military to follow any such order absent a declaration of war or some other form of congressional authorization. But the settled precedent, ratified by key Democratic Party leaders as recently as the bombing of Serbia during the Kosovo crisis, is that no such authorization is necessary. I'm not happy with this situation and think it's crazy that we as a country have moved away from the constitutional procedure, but the cat's been out of the bag for a while now and if Bush wants to bomb Iran Bush will bomb Iran.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.