I've been over this a few times already, but Mother Jones's David Corn delves into more detail and concludes: "Clinton and her aides have been peddling false information about Obama to undercut one of his primary arguments: she voted for the war; I was against it. Engaging in such disingenuous attacks may help Clinton beat back Obama, but it is hardly the way for her to counter Obama's claim that she represents poltics-as-usual. It only proves his point."
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.