Scott Shane, David Johnston, and James Risen for The New York Times make this one of those days where I regret reading my key blogs before my morning newspaper by reporting a big story "Secret U.S. Endorsement of Severe Interrogations"
But soon after Alberto R. Gonzales’s arrival as attorney general in February 2005, the Justice Department issued another opinion, this one in secret. It was a very different document, according to officials briefed on it, an expansive endorsement of the harshest interrogation techniques ever used by the Central Intelligence Agency.
The new opinion, the officials said, for the first time provided explicit authorization to barrage terror suspects with a combination of painful physical and psychological tactics, including head-slapping, simulated drowning and frigid temperatures.
Mr. Gonzales approved the legal memorandum on “combined effects” over the objections of James B. Comey, the deputy attorney general, who was leaving his job after bruising clashes with the White House. Disagreeing with what he viewed as the opinion’s overreaching legal reasoning, Mr. Comey told colleagues at the department that they would all be “ashamed” when the world eventually learned of it.
You'd like to think they'll feel ashamed, but I really doubt it.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.