First NFL game of the season tonight. I've thought things over and, damnit, if I'm going to live in DC the rest of my life (and I probably am), then it's time for me to become a Redskins fan. Conveniently, I can kick things off by defending Joe Gibbs against Bill Simmons' smears:

To the dumbest plan of the year: the Redskins investing in two free agent receivers (Antwan Randle-El and Brandon Lloyd) and an expensive offensive coordinator (Al Saunders) to go with their expensive gamebreakers (Clinton Portis and Santana Moss) … only they're going with a washed-up Mark Brunell at QB again. How does that make sense?



I like this plan. Quarterbacks are overemphasized. Obviously, a star quarterback is a wonderful thing to have. But saying your team could use one is kind of like saying your NBA team needs a dominant big man. Personally, I need a pony. The question is, what can you do about it? It's not like there was some no-brainer alternative available. Brunell, who's clearly not a great quarterback, nevertheless QBed the team to a winning season. Then the idea is to add some parts -- Randle-El, Lloyd, Saunders -- that count as clear upgrades over what the offense used to have, and you stand a very good shot of doing better next time. The only real alternative would have been some kind of crapshoot or else just doing nothing.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.