Dr Mari Carmen Ramirez, Wortham Curator of Latin American Art and
Director, International Center for the Arts of the Americas at the
Museum of Fine Arts Houston, discusses Latin American Art at the Aspen
Ideas Festival
What follows are my notes based on a talk given
by Dr. Mari Carmen Ramirez at the Aspen Ideas Festival, July 10, 2010:
The ICAA:
The International Center for Arts of the
Americas (ICAA) at the Museum of Fine Arts Houston is a unique resource
center for the study of 20th Century Latin American and Latino Art.
Established in 2001, its mission is to transform perceptions of Latin
American and Latino Art and open new avenues of intercultural dialogue
and exchange. The ICAA's signature initiative is the Documents of 20th
Century Latin American and Latino Art: A Digital Archive and
Publications Project whose web-based digital archive - which is
scheduled to launch in the Fall of 2011 - will provide free universal
access to key writings by artists, artistic movements, critics, and
curators from Mexico, Central and South America, the Caribbean, and the
United States.
The Problem:
Much of Latin American and
Latino Art of the 20th century is poorly documented. The market,
particularly the international market, for much of the work was not
developed until relatively recently. For example, Sotheby's only created
a category for Latin American Art in 1979 and there is no category or
mainstream market for Latino art. An accessible resource that taps into
the intellectual foundations of this art is needed.
The ICAA at
Houston is now ten years old.
Our principal goals are to:
Recover
and digitally publish primary and critical documents relevant to Latin
American and Latino art of the 20th Century.
Provide open access
to these documents for all those interested in 20th century Latin
American and Latino Art.
Publish selections of these documents
in the form of thematic anthologies that will complement the digital
archive.
Establish a dynamic digital archive and research
program devoted to providing a sound basis of scholarship for this work.
Recovery:
As
part of our efforts we have initiated a systematic effort to recover
original documents relevant to Latin American and Latino Art of the 20th
century. This effort is encompassed by the ICAA's Documents Project.
These include key documents from the artist's own papers and collections
as well as contemporaneous press and art criticism. Our work is made
difficult by a precarious infrastructure in many of the countries, poor
distribution and lack of policies aimed at preserving books, archival
material, and key documents.
Curate:
To address these and
other issues we have created a "think tank" comprised of scholars and
experts on the art produced along this cultural axis who generously
contribute their expertise and are helping the ICAA further our goal to
preserve and make accessible documents that will change perceptions of
Latin American and Latino art. To date, the Center has published 11
books and catalogs and held 4 major international symposia.
Access:
We
have established regional centers for the study of Latin American Art
in 10 cities that include: Buenos Aires (Argentina), Santiago/Valparaiso
(Chile), São Paulo (Brazil), Lima (Peru), Caracas (Venezuela), Bogotá
(Colombia), Mexico City, Los Angeles, South Bend (Indiana), and Houston.
The project also has research affiliates in San Juan (Puerto Rico),
Miami, and New York. In each location we recover documents, scan and
digitize them, catalogue and annotate them. Beginning in Fall 2011, we
will make them all publicly available, free of charge, in the project's
specially designed Website. Through this monumental undertaking, we are
creating a "multinational super information highway."
This data
is intended to provide a sound intellectual foundation for the long-term
growth and development of the field of Latin American and Latino art.
Our hope is that this archive will help fill gaps in the worldwide
knowledge and appreciation of this art as well provide the necessary
research tools for scholars, students, collectors, museum and arts
professional, and anyone else interested in this art.
Scholarship:
At
present we have over 100 researchers distributed amongst the ten
project sites. Our headquarters are in Houston. The project's team
members include senior and junior art historians, researchers,
librarians, IT specialists, editors, translators, and administrators. We
are governed by a 17-member Editorial Board and a 10-member steering
committee. By the time we launch the project's website in Fall 2011 we
will have a collection of over 10,000 critical document and more than
55,000 related images. We are committed to continue to expand this
archive which, in theory at least, is limitless.
By art world
standards, in which the perceived glamor resides in promoting artists
and organizing exhibitions, the often tedious work of archiving and
documenting is hardly enticing. The ICAA's work, in particular, is
mostly behind the scenes and has an assembly line character. However, it
fulfills the indispensable role of adding the crucial information and
context to exhibitions and publications that enable a deeper
appreciation of the art presented.
Several illustrations of the
type of documents collected were shown in photos. These include photos
artists at work, artists' notes, contemporary newspaper reviews, and
gallery handouts.
Examples:
The profusely
illustrated documents by Caracas' radical collective El Techo de la
Ballena
-Luis Felipe Noé's art criticism of the 1950s (Argentina)
-
Brazil's "Ruptura Manifesto"
-Documentation of a series of debates
between Antonio Berni and David Alfaro Siqueiros in Argentina during
1933
- The precursory responses to a survey published in Havana's
Revista de avance from 1927 to 1929 that debated the existence and
definition of the concept of Latin American art
-The critical
work of the Guatemala-born, Mexico City-based artist, Carlos Mérida that
illuminates the work of other artists at a time when there was little
established art criticism of their work.
-The recipes for colors and
tonalities developed by Hélio Oiticica, the Brazilian avant-garde
artist, for his Grand Nucleus installation (1960-68)
In 2011 we
will launch the ICAA digital archive. The archive will be a free online
resource for all. Simultaneous to the launching of the site, the ICAA
will publish the first volume in the parallel Critical Documents of
Latin American and Latino Art book series, 13 thematic anthologies that
will provide English translations for documents from the online
resource. Our hope is that the web-based archive and the book series
will provide a visible space of Latin American Art in the United States
and elsewhere and will transmit a rich legacy of knowledge to future
generations.
Questions from the audience.
Q: Have we
transcended the need for Latin American Specialists?
MCR:
Absolutely not. Latin American Art is now mainstream yet there are still
huge gaps in our understanding of the thousands of artists and
movements at work in the more than twenty countries that make up the
region throughout the 20th century. There is a lot of information out
there about the contemporary manifestations of this art but very little
serious historical scholarship. The field has grown horizontally yet
lacks depth. This is what the ICAA's Documents Project is trying to
address. We need a high degree of scholarship to support the
understanding and appreciation of Latin American and Latino art in both
its historical and contemporary manifestations.
Promoters of
the global view argue that Latin American art is now global, yet we need
to bear in mind that all art is both local and global. We cannot
side-step the local and what it implies in terms of the contextual
factors affecting the emergence and development of a particular form of
art. Latin American art is no exception.
What is really at stake
behind the "global" position is a market-driven, economic process that
has transformed the status of Latin American art in contemporary
artistic circuits. Globalization has turned Latin American art into a
strategic economic resource. Over the last 10-15 year this art has
become a favorite commodity in the current market, providing additional
justification for careful scholarship and documentation. Curiously, all
this attention has created a movement to re-regionalize, a tendency
which calls for expert knowledge such as the one that the ICAA is trying
to provide.
A persistent issue in the field is that Latin
American art has traditionally been considered to be derivative. Those
of us working in this field over the last three decades have set out to
prove that this is not the case. Since the early 20th century, Latin
American artists have engaged in original research. They have made
important theoretical contributions to art and aesthetics and have
produced forms of art that in many cases have anticipated important
developments in Europe and the United States. To understand these
developments we need to get roots of this art and understand its
development in depth. This can only be done through key writings and
other documentation that shed light on the intellectual process that
nurtured the art. This is the ultimate goal of the ICAA Documents
project.
Q: What is Latin American Art and what is Latino Art?
How do they differ?
MCR: Latin American Art is an operational term
used to describe art actually made in the more than twenty countries
that make up Latin America and that encompass Mexico, Central and South
America, and the Caribbean. Latino art refers to the work of artists of
Latin American origin (usually by birth, family ties, or education) who
work primarily in the United States.
Q: Doesn't the term Latino
Art unfairly segregate artists? After all do we call Pollock a
Polish-American Artist or de Kooning a Dutch-American artist? What do we
call artists of Latin American origin who were born in the US?
MCR: I
do not believe that the term Latin American or Latino Art is
segregating as we use it. As I have said, this is another pressing
reason why we need to document this work and also, I believe, to study
this art in the social milieu in which it arose, either in Latin America
or the United States. We do want to understand the social context of
the work. We do want to examine patterns of inversion or assimilation of
received artistic tenets.
We call artists of Latin American origin
living in the United States "Latinos." This is a political term that
signals the largest ethnic majority in the United States at present. The
use of this term does not segregate these artists, instead it brings
attention upon their roots and cultural heritage. As an ascendant
minority, these artists need legitimization. We do have Museums of
African American Art in the United States and there is a National Museum
of Women's Art. However, I believe Latinos are best served by
displaying their art next to the art of other groups, particularly North
American, European, and even Asian artists.
Q: Does your
center also include architecture as art? Are you collecting original
drawings by Latin American architects as does MOMA for example?
MCR:
No. At the moment our collection does not include architecture.
Q:
Will you extend your collection and research to Colonial Art of Latin
America?
MCR: We may extend our collection to include colonial art,
but have no plans at present to expand our research and documentation
work in this area. Other institutions such as the Los Angeles County
Museum of Art (LACMA) and the Denver Art Museum have established
programs dedicated to Colonial Art. We gain by dividing the effort.
Q:
And Chicano Art?
MCR: Both our research and our collection include
"Chicano Art" (the art of Mexican-Americans, mostly living in
California, Texas and the Southwest). To that effect, we have partnered
with other research centers devoted to Chicano Art, such as UCLA's
Chicano Studies Research Center and the University of Notre Dame's
Institute for Latino Studies.
Q: And Puerto Rican Art?
MCR:
It is interesting that both Chicano and Puerto Rican art in the United
States form an important part of the Civil Rights legacy and dialog. The
Documents Project has actively collected documentation on both
island-based Puerto Rican art as well as Nuyorican art in the United
States through partnerships and researchers ceded at the University of
Puerto Rico's museum in San Juan and Hunter College's Center for Puerto
Rican Studies in New York City, respectively.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.