Alabama Faith-Based Adoption Agencies Can Deny Gay Couples

Alabama Governor Kay Ivey signed a bill Wednesday making it legal for private faith-based adoption agencies to turn away gay couples. The new law does not apply to agencies that receive state or federal funding. The bill, known as the Alabama Child Placing Agency Inclusion Act, was approved last month by the state Senate in a vote of 23-9. All eight Senate Democrats voted against the bill, along with one Republican senator, Steve Livingston. At the time, Senator Rodger Smitherman of Birmingham said the bill would “sanction discrimination.” Representative Patricia Todd, who is openly gay, shared a similar view, calling the bill “bigotry in the first degree.”

Despite this outspoken dissent, the bill was approved last week by an 87-0 vote in the House of Representatives, with six representatives abstaining. In a statement on Wednesday, Governor Ivey said she “ultimately signed [the bill] because it ensures hundreds of children can continue to find ‘forever homes’ through religiously-affiliated adoption agencies.” Ivy went on: “This bill is not about discrimination, but instead protects the ability of religious agencies to place vulnerable children in a permanent home.”

The governor’s words echoed earlier rhetoric from Republican senators, who defended the bill on the grounds that secular adoption agencies remain available to gay couples. “Those individuals who want to go that route have that route,” said Senate President pro tempore Adelbert Marsh. “What we’re trying to do is say [sic], ‘OK, you also can’t discriminate against religious organizations who want the ability to place these kids where they think they’d be best suited.’”

Most adoptions in Alabama go through the Alabama Department of Human Resources, which does not explicitly prohibit gay couples from adopting. “Our policy only says that single adults and married couples can adopt,” Barry Spear, the department’s public information manager, told AL.com. “We use the word ‘married’ and, whatever the legal definition of that is, that’s what we follow.” While same-sex marriage has been legal in Alabama since 2015, some counties have refrained from distributing marriage licenses to avoid having to approve licenses for gay couples.

Last week, Representative Todd said the adoption bill was a direct reaction to the approval of same-sex marriage in the U.S. In recent years, states like South Dakota and Michigan have passed similar adoption laws in the name of religious liberty. According to Eva Kendrick, the state director of the Human Rights Campaign Alabama, the Alabama law opens the door for agencies to refuse qualified residents based on additional factors, including family structure and martial status.

Nevertheless, Governor Ivey referred to Alabama as “a place where we care for our neighbors, and lend a hand to those we don't know.” The bill, she said, “ensures that the neediest among us, children who need to feel the love and security of a family, are cared for.”

David Dinielli, the deputy legal director for the Southern Poverty Law Center, sang a different tune on Wednesday. “We are disappointed that one of the very first pieces of legislation Governor Kay Ivey chose to sign is a bill intended to target LGBT kids and stigmatize LGBT families,” Dinielli said in a statement. “If the governor had hoped to signal a new day in Alabama government, this was the wrong way to do it.”

About the Author

Aria Bendix is a frequent contributor to The Atlantic, and a former editorial fellow at CityLab. Her work has appeared on Bustle and The Harvard Crimson.

Twitter

The Senate parliamentarian’s rejection of important provisions of the GOP’s Obamacare repeal bill puts its status in further jeopardy.

On Friday, Senate Democrats released a list of provisions in the Republican health-care bill that the Senate parliamentarian holds can pass via a simple, filibuster-proof majority vote. Among those provisions that didn’t meet her scrutiny are the bill’s plans to defund Planned Parenthood, restrict tax-credit funding for insurance plans that provide abortions, and a six-month “lockout” period from purchasing insurance for people who don’t maintain continuous coverage.

If this preliminary guidance holds, the Better Care Reconciliation Act—which is already in dire straits—seems likely to fail.

The final assessment of the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, is a critical step in the GOP’s strategy for passing their bill to repeal and replace Obamacare. Republicans have opted to pass their health-care legislation via the special reconciliation process, under which they can cut debate short in the Senate and thus eliminate indefinite filibusters, which Democrats would certainly use in order to block any attempt to repeal Obamacare. But bills have to follow a certain procedure—called the Byrd Rule—in order to pass by reconciliation.