A federal judge dismissed a 2012 fine against a drone photographer on Thursday. The fine was the first leveled by the Federal Aviation Administration over the commercial use of unmanned aircraft.
In 2011, Raphael Pirker flew an unmanned craft over the University of Virginia campus, then sold video and photos collected during the flight to the university. The FAA fined $10,000 for violations including operating in a reckless manner.
Pirker then filed a motion with the National Transportation Safety Board, calling into question exactly what allowed the FAA to enact such fines. A judge agreed with their assertion, ruling:
at the time of Respondent’s model aircraft operation, as alleged herein, there was no enforceable FAA rule or FAR Regulation, applicable to model aircraft or for classifying model aircraft as an [Unmanned Aircraft System].
The decision seemingly flies in the face of FAA drone regulations. Last month, they wrote that there was no gradient of legality concerning the matter: “Anyone who wants to fly an aircraft—manned or unmanned—in U.S. airspace needs some level of FAA approval.” The FAA has not issued any commercial permits for drone use (aside from Arctic research).
Congress has passed legislation mandating that the FAA establish drone regulations by the fall of 2015. There are currently eight sites in the U.S. for testing drones in order to determine FAA policy.
This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.