Some of these are old, but they were new to me and perhaps might have escaped your notice too.
1) Felix Salmon on Jeff Bezos and the Washington Post. This came out a week ago, but for me rang exactly true on the differing cultures of the tech world vs. the journalism world, and the ways in which the Post's new owner is and is not likely to succeed.
2) Army Col. Gian Gentile, writing today in the LA Times, on whether the wars in Iraq and [even] Afghanistan were worth it. Answer in one word: No. For more words, see his column, but here is a sample of his argument about Afghanistan, always the "better" of those two wars. He doesn't say we should never have gone in but argues that we should have gotten out at least a decade ago.
Since early 2002, more than 2,000 Americans have been killed [in Afghanistan], with many more seriously wounded. Thousands of Afghan civilians have been killed too. The United States has spent close to $1 trillion trying to turn Afghanistan into a modern, functioning state.
What has the United States achieved? The place is more violent today than it was at the height of the Afghan surge of troops under Gen. Stanley McChrystal in 2009, the government is one of the most corrupt in the world, and the ability of the Afghan security forces is dubious at best.
Would Afghanistan have been worse off today if the United States had left soon after toppling the Taliban and crushing Al Qaeda? Remember, the United States had essentially accomplished its core political objective in Afghanistan — the destruction of Al Qaeda there — by early 2002.
In the same vein, Ted Koppel a week ago, on "America's Chronic Over-Reaction to Terrorism." At least rhetorically and intellectually, critical mass may be assembling on this point. After all, President Obama himself gave a "time to end the war on terror" speech a few months ago. As for policies aligned with that concept, see: Snowden, Edward. For the record, this is the line I've been pushing for a long time.
3) Marc Ambinder, on "Why Stop and Frisk is Worse Than NSA Surveillance." We all know why to be concerned about the NSA. Ambinder makes a strong case that the recently-outlawed Stop and Frisk searches were a more serious and here-and-now instance of surveillance-state overreach. This is connected to the aerial stop-and-frisk chronicles I've mentioned earlier, and will return to.
