Bradley Manning will not be the Grand Marshal of the San Francisco Pride Parade. His ability to participate in the festivities was never in question (he's in a military prison for the foreseeable future), but for a few hours today, word got around that he had been named the Grand Marshal of the June parade and that Daniel Ellsberg would serve in his place.
This did not go down well with some, who called it an insult to all LBGT members of the armed forces. Now San Francisco Pride Board president Lisa L. Williams has released a statement denying that Manning was ever close to becoming the Grand Marshal:
A staff person at SF Pride, acting under his own initiative, prematurely contacted Bradley Manning based on internal conversations within the SF Pride organization. That was an error and that person has been disciplined. He does not now, nor did he at that time, speak for SF Pride.
Williams continued to lay out the complex inner workings of the San Francisco Pride Board:
In point of fact, less than 15 people actually cast votes for Bradley Manning. These 15 people are part of what is called the SF Pride Electoral College, comprised of former SF Pride Grand Marshals. However, as an organization with a responsibility to serve the broader community, SF Pride repudiates this vote. The Board of Directors for SF Pride never voted to support this nomination. Bradley Manning will have his day in court, but will not serve as an official participant in the SF Pride Parade.
This news was not well-received, either. For instance:
So now there's one side that's still furious with SF Pride for naming Manning a Grand Marshal and another that's furious with SF Pride for "backing down" from its nomination in the wake of the anti-Manning outcry and denying that he was ever named the Grand Marshal in the first place. SF Pride just can't win.
This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.