This article is from the archive of our partner .

When New York federal judge Jack Weinstein ruled last week that poker is indeed a game of skill, he based the decision off defendant Lawrence DiCristina's 120-page report that included this striking chart showing the difference in earnings between the ten best and worst poker players in a study.

DiCristina took the chart from economist Randal Heeb, who studied 415 million hands of No Limit Texas Hold’em on website PokerStars in the course of a year. The y-axis represents cumulative earnings and the x-axis is time. 

As you can see, top winners keep winning, and top losers keep losing. Heeb concluded that though luck played a role, “[t]he fact that the winning players tend to win consistently and the losing players tend to lose consistently demonstrates that there is a skill differential between these groups.”

This and other charts convinced Judge Weinstein to rule that an electronics dealer was not violating a gambling law on the premise that poker is, in fact, more about skill.

Chart from jurist.org (pdf) via flowingdata

This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.