This week, the 10 year anniversary of 9/11 makes it every newspaper and magazine's duty to present a "big picture" assessment of American life in the years following the 2001 attacks. And because one of the most tangible ways to convey the impact of a shared event is to slap a number on it, everybody's doing it. Observe: the various ways to quantify the cost of 9/11:
The airline "security fee" After 9/11, airline passengers were met with longer lines, more expensive snacks and more pat downs. Over at CNN Money, Jessica Dickler put a price on those additions:
For each leg of a journey that requires them to board a plane, passengers now pay a $2.50 September 11th Security Fee, which goes toward financing the TSA's staff, operations and screening equipment -- like those new body scanners. (Passengers don't pay the fee more than twice per one-way trip.)
Last year, airlines and passengers contributed $2 billion in taxes and fees to the TSA. The federal government -- in other words, taxpayers -- picked up the rest of the organization's $8 billion tab.
Now, there's a proposal in front of Congress to double the September 11th Security Fee to $5 per enplanement.
The agency by agency cost In Today's New York Times, Shan Carter and Amanda Cox gather estimates from a range of experts and breaks down the attack's fees agency by agency with a grand total of $3.3 trillion, including costs for war funding, homeland security, economic impact, veteran's care and physical damage. Here's a portion of their department breakdown. See the whole thing here.
The al-Qaeda vs. America cost ratio The New York Times David Sanger looks at the figures another way, noting the investment al-Qaeda made into 9/11. "America’s bill for fighting a 21st-century 'asymmetric war' comes to at least $3.3 trillion. Put another way, for every dollar Al Qaeda spent to pull off the Sept. 11 attacks, the cost to the United States was an astonishing $6.6 million."
The grand total government costs In a Thursday post by John Stossel at Reason, the libertarian writer pulls the grand total costs of the attacks from the National Priorities Project. The federal transparency group cites a much higher number than The Times for total costs, which stands at $8 trillion. In a breakdown of that figure, the group scores $5.9 trillion from Pentagon spending. $1.36 trillion from the total costs of the Iraq and Afghan wars up to this fiscal year and $636 billion on homeland security costs, all adjusted for inflation.
Is putting a tally on all this worth it? As we noted in May when the Financial Times introduced its more modest $2 trillion price tag on America's response to 9/11, this is a really difficult process that isn't likely to produce a definitive answer (no matter how badly we want one). As Atlantic Wire colleague Adam Martin wrote, "People have all kinds of costs they can pin on 9/11, from the Florida Gators 2001 football championship to criminal prosecutions against drug dealers... Trying to put a price tag on him is just going to drive everyone crazy."
This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.