This article is from the archive of our partner .

AUTHOR: Joe Rehyansky

FORUM: The Daily Caller

THESIS: "Lesbians should be allowed to serve, gay men (hereafter 'gays') should not."

ARTICLE OPENS WITH: Author recalling once showering with "40 or so friends, acquaintances, and virtual strangers," an anecdote with no apparent connection to the rest of the article.

WHY MEN 'ARE MORE PROMISCUOUS': Because of insurmountable evolutionary forces.

EARLY HUMAN HISTORY, NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH TARZAN: "It fell to men to swing through the trees and scour the caves in search of as many women as possible to subdue and impregnate — a tough job but someone had to do it."

LIFE FOR ANCIENT WOMEN: "They did not have access to Mace, police whistles, Lady Smith .38s, or domestic violence hotlines."

VAGUE DENUNCIATION OF GAY MEN: "The associations and lifestyles of [male] gays encourage these opposing natural forces."

CLEAR DENUNCIATION OF GAY MEN: "Most men who are sexually attracted to other men can and do indulge their promiscuous urges with little or no restraint; i.e., it’s 'party time' all the time."

HOW GAY MEN ENDANGER THE MILITARY: "Gays spread disease at a rate out of all proportion to their numbers in our population ... A significant population of gays in the military has the potential for disastrous health consequences."

DID GAY MEN SERVE IN WW2?: Author states they did not. It's unclear why, how he knows this, or how they presumably avoided the draft.

ORIGINAL REPORTING: Author notes that "the Internet [is] saturated with gay porn."

CLOSING STATEMENT: Reminder that military showers are filled with "lithe naked bodies" and "beefcake parades."

This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.