The building that today houses the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery—and many of the images in this special issue of The Atlantic—was originally the U.S. Patent Office, and later also housed the U.S. Department of the Interior. During the early years of the Civil War, the building served as a barracks for Union soldiers, and as a hospital and morgue after battles at Manassas, Antietam, and Fredericksburg. Walt Whitman, who tended to the wounded as a nurse there, called it “the noblest of Washington buildings.” On March 6, 1865, Abraham Lincoln held his second inaugural ball on the third floor. (National Portrait Gallery)
Sheltering from a thunderstorm in an empty freight car, the one-term congressman—the one with the habit of telling dirty jokes, and dodging tough questions, and lying to deflect annoying visitors—squatted on the floor, wrapped his arms around his knees, and roared with laughter at his wife’s ridiculous ambition for him. “Just think of such a sucker as me as President!,” Abraham Lincoln told our correspondent, Henry Villard. Villard would later marvel that this man, who caused him “disgust and humiliation,” would prove “one of the great leaders of mankind in adversity.”
As the writers in this issue witnessed the country’s most terrible and transformative passage, they felt, and reported, the “magnetic personality” of John Brown; walked the anxious streets of Charleston on the eve of the attack on Fort Sumter; joined with Union soldiers quartering (and making mock speeches) in the House of Representatives; listened late one starlit night as Ulysses Grant, puffing on a Havana cigar by his tent, defended himself against the charge that he was a butcher of men. They saw the tide of war turn, and were in Richmond when it was liberated—when Lincoln, holding his young son’s hand, passed through the jubilant crowd, pausing to remove his hat and, in silence, return the bow of an elderly black man.
It is possible, in these pages, to enter into both the humanity of figures consecrated or condemned by history and the uncertainty the writers must have felt during the rush of events. Yes, we know that Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. survived being shot in the neck at Antietam to become one of our greatest Supreme Court justices; but the reader may still share some of the tension of his father, a physician and a founder of this magazine, when, via “telegraphic messenger,” he received the harrowing news in the dead of night and set out for the wavering front line to search hospitals, improvised on battlefields and in churches, for his Captain H. (As the elder Holmes neared the front, he referred with asperity—could it have been despair?—to “our so-called civilization.”)
When The Atlantic originally published many of these pieces, the most-consequential questions the country has faced were wide open: Would the Union survive? Would slavery? What did it mean to be an American? And so the writers not only bore witness but also argued toward the answers. The founders of this magazine and its first contributors disagreed about many things, but, with the exception of the ambivalent Nathaniel Hawthorne, they were radicals in the cause of abolition. Along with the desire to cultivate an American literary voice, the moral and militant struggle against slavery—the struggle to free the idea of America from corrupting delusions—is what gave birth to The Atlantic and shaped its character.
“The discussion of Slavery is said to be dangerous,” wrote James Russell Lowell, the first editor, in 1860. “But dangerous to what?” And: “In a democracy it is the duty of every citizen to think.”
The war was quickening other changes in the country, as suggested by that telegraphic messenger. Trains were rushing troops toward the front, while a steam-powered, ironclad ship—“silent and sullen, the floating fort,” Longfellow wrote—could make short work of the mightiest sloop of war. Holmes perceived a new “perpetual intercommunication” of news, an “equalizing and steadying of public opinion.”
Amid the turmoil, we recognize enduring types we might otherwise have mistaken as modern: As he noted how repetitious the Lincoln-Douglas debates had become or complained of Lincoln’s evasions about secession, Henry Villard sounded every bit the veteran political reporter; while in his glib cynicism about national politics, Hawthorne wrote like he was a little too cool for it all. Emerson, the very model of the successful op-ed columnist, first demanded an emancipation proclamation, then praised the president for delivering it. (Lincoln, like other presidents we have known, was alert to the emerging possibilities of the new media, from the power of photography to the founding ambition of The Atlantic to be “of no party or clique.” He once objected when a writer said he intended to publish an anti-slavery piece in Horace Greeley’s New YorkTribune. “Can’t you get it into The Atlantic Monthly?” Lincoln asked. “It would have less of a partisan look there.”)
The pieces in this special issue, deftly excerpted by our contributing editor and unofficial archivist, Sage Stossel, are arranged in three sections: the run-up to the war, the war itself, and Reconstruction. Though stories in The Atlantic were published anonymously from the magazine’s founding in 1857 until 1870, we have added bylines throughout. We have kept the original titles except in six instances, noted in each case. Alongside reported articles and essays we have included fiction, including Sarah Orne Jewett’s tale of a shattered plantation owner and Mark Twain’s account of a freed slave’s reunion with her stolen son. Throughout, we have drawn on the collection of our partner in creating this issue, the National Portrait Gallery.
Within each section, you will find that the dates of original publication may skip around. After Booker T. Washington’s 1896 argument for practical education, we have placed W. E. B. Du Bois’s 1902 rejoinder, “Of the Training of Black Men.” Only after that do we publish Du Bois’s 1897 lament about emancipation, that “the freedman has not yet found in freedom his promised land.” It immediately precedes Ta-Nehisi Coates’s essay on how blacks have been written out of the Civil War.
It seemed to us that these Atlantic pieces have a way of conversing across the decades. And so in this issue, one finds Garry Wills’s account from 1992 of how Lincoln used the Gettysburg Address to reinterpret the Constitution and thereby “revolutionized the Revolution, giving people a new past to live with that would change their future indefinitely.” And then, equipped with that explication of how Lincoln purified the nation’s meaning, and with President Obama’s summation of what that meaning is, the reader can then encounter, with fresh appreciation, Lowell’s epitaph for Lincoln: “New birth of our new soil, the first American.”
We want to hear what you think. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.