The Fading Memory of South Asia's Partition

This week, Indians and Pakistanis have been showering the night sky with fireworks, singing patriotic songs, and memorializing national heroes in observation of their respective independence days (Pakistan’s was Thursday, India’s Friday).

But the 67th birthday of the antagonistic South Asian neighbors is also the grim anniversary of their divorce in the partition of 1947, when the British hastily and arbitrarily divided up the landmass formerly known as India along religious lines while leaving behind their former colony. The new borders created roughly 14 million refugees as Muslims in India and Hindus in Pakistan found themselves on the wrong side of the line, in what some historians have called the largest mass migration in human history. Estimates vary, but hundreds of thousands of civilians died in the process.

The legacy of tension has persisted for nearly seven decades, but one thing people on both sides of the India-Pakistan border have shared is the memory of partition's trauma. Now, though, people who were children in 1947 are in their seventies and eighties, meaning that these common memories are fading.

Guneeta Singh Bhalla hopes to preserve them. Born in India, Bhalla grew up hearing her grandmother recount fleeing Pakistan at independence. When Bhalla moved to the U.S. in middle school, she wondered why what her grandmother had called “an apocalypse” wasn’t covered in history classes alongside other important world events. On a trip to Hiroshima in college, Bhalla saw a memorial to the victims of the atomic bomb, with a collection of writings and videos from survivors. “That’s when it hit home,” Bhalla told me in an interview. “Watching these survivors talk about how their lives had completely turned upside down just for being at the wrong place at the wrong time made it real." She wanted to make partition real and understandable in the same way.

Thus was born the 1947 Partition Archive, a library of videos and audio clips capturing the memories of migrants who crossed the subcontinent's new borders during partition. Sukhmander Singh, who was in second grade at the time, recounts memories of “fear ... apprehension, not knowing what was going to happen,” and visiting empty houses where Muslims had lived in his village, which ended up on the Indian side of the border. "One Muslim boy was my friend. ... We were together in the same class, you know? And he never showed up, but where did he go? We don't know."

Shane Ali recounts learning to forgive after watching a man shoot his mother and brother. "I forgive ... the evil people who killed my family," he says. "My own thinking is, just love everyone, hate no one."

The subcontinent's demographics are making these kinds of stories increasingly rare. The populations of both India and Pakistan are among the youngest in the world: 29.9 percent of Indians and 33.8 percent of Pakistanis are under the age of 14. This does not mean suspicion has faded on the subcontinent, however; 80 percent of Indians still view Pakistan as a very serious threat. For their part, only 13 percent of Pakistanis hold a favorable view of India.

But Bhalla, who is in her mid-30s, notes the enduring lesson of partition for people who never experienced it firsthand. “We are pretty lucky to be living in a time and a place where it’s not so fragile that you have to up and leave your house and everything behind because of total chaos that is beyond our control.”

About the Author

Tanya Basu, a former editorial fellow with The Atlantic, is a freelance writer based in Brooklyn who writes about how we interact with each other.

The Trump administration shouldn’t get too excited about Kim Jong Un’s pledge to limit his weapons program.

Over the past four months, North Korea has been saying all the right things. After weeks of silence regarding his intentions for upcoming summits with South Korea and the United States, Kim Jong Un, the leader of North Korea, made a dramatic announcement on Saturday morning, pledging unilateral limits on his nuclear weapons and missile programs. Though the announcement has been widely hailed as encouraging—President Donald Trump declared it a sign of “big progress”—it does not, in fact, set up a path to denuclearization. It does, however, open the door to capping Kim’s arsenal, keeping America and its allies safer while talks are underway.

Speaking before the central committee of his country’s governing party, Kim described six so-called “decisions” on nuclear-weapons policy. These included a declaration that North Korea was satisfied with its existing nuclear warhead designs, and that it had discontinued all nuclear and intercontinental-range ballistic missile (ICBM) tests and closed its nuclear test site at Punggye Ri. Kim also announced that North Korea would suspend nuclear testing, and reiterated his commitment not to use nuclear weapons “unless there is [a] nuclear threat,” and to stop the proliferation of nuclear technology. In addition, he said that North Korea would concentrate on developing its economy and improving dialogue with neighboring countries.