Jeremy Ben-Ami, the head of J Street, the left-wing pro-Israel gorup, tells Marc Tracy that Peter Beinart's call for a boycott of goods made in West Bank settlements is completely counterproductive:
"He thinks that pressure on settlers on an individual basis will get them to rethink their enterprise," he explained. "I don't think that's going to happen. They think the world is against them, and this will only reinforce their belief that they're right and reestablish their intensity to hold onto the land."
I don't have much good to say about Beinart's call for a boycott, because I find economic warfare targeting Jews so distasteful, for obvious historical reasons. (As readers of Goldblog know, I would like to see the settlers out of the West Bank as well, but this is a very bad way to go about achieving the goal.) And to be completely blunt, I'm not that interested in debating Peter's new book, which I've just finished reading, because I find his recounting of recent Middle East history one-sided and filled with errors and omissions. The Middle East crisis is complicated, except in Peter's telling. It's hard to argue with Peter's work precisely because there's so much missing. He has some interesting things to say about American Jewish priorities, however, and I'll get to that soon. Here's David Frum, by the way, on the call for a boycott. He thinks Peter is being destructive. And here's Ami Eden on how Peter's call for a boycott targeting Jews will inevitably lead to Jewish boycotts of Peter Beinart.
We want to hear what you think. Submit a letter to the editor or write to email@example.com.