This article is from the archive of our partner .

Big Tobacco may tolerate some diseased mouths and humongous cancer warnings on cigarette packs, but a required "ugly olive green" color scheme on every box is one step too far. This morning, The New York Times reported that Philip Morris is "initiat[ing] legal action" against the Australian government for requiring a color scheme which would "partly eras[e] the advantage of brand recognition enjoyed by global tobacco names like Marlboro and Camel." The Australian's idea, as you can see below, is to make smoking even less appealing by blurring together every brand into olive-green sameness.

When the United States Food and Drug Administration introduced similar labels last week (sans olive green), Big Tobacco made the same saber-rattling warnings: "the four leading tobacco companies were all threatening legal action, saying the images would unfairly hurt their property and free-speech rights by obscuring their brand names in retail displays," the Times previously wrote. Today, a Philip Morris Asia spokesman said in a statement to the paper that "We believe we have a very strong legal case and will be seeking significant financial compensation for the damage to our business."

For context: here's a larger-than-you-feel-like-looking-at glimpse of the Australian olive-green mockups:

This article is from the archive of our partner The Wire.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.