Two more views about "security," from opposite sides of the world. First, a reader who travels frequently between China and the United States
compares the airport-security experience in the two countries, in
response to this
>> As a former Minnesota local prosecutor... thanks for continuing to point out the absurdities and outright idiocy of security theater in the US. How anybody who knows anything about genuine public safety could agree that what's happening in the US has much to do with genuine public safety is beyond me. But I'm also not writing about that.
As a 12+ year resident of Shenzhen... I did want to confirm your experience with security in this place where dissidents are locked up: I've only had to take off my shoes once when passing through airport security and have never once had to open up (or turn on) my computer or any other electronic device.
My favorite experience, though, was this: I tend to glower at the folks doing the bag searches before getting on the plane. I guess the agents sense the glowering because twice now, I've the Chinese security agents apologize to me for having to do this... one apologized and then whispered to me "Sorry. The Americans make us do this. It's useless, I'm embarrassed." On the other occasion, the agent verbally apologized and gave a quick head bow as he rezipped my bag.
On the flight where the first Chinese agent apologized to me, when we arrived in the US and deplaned, we were met by two US agents and a German shepherd which sniffed us all as we passed by. One of the agents must have been 250 pounds and towered over the deplaning passengers, most of whom were Asian. The agents had their batons out, guns visible, and tasers.What a contrast - an apology from Chinese security agents at the start of the trip and intimidation upon arriving in the US. Welcome to the land of the free and home of the brave. That the governing classes who so piously mouth platitudes about American exceptionalism are silent in the face of these atrocities to the liberties of innocents says more about America's decline than any of the numerous economic comparisons.<<
Now, from a US government official based on Washington DC, who like many of us here spends a lot of time in the Metro:
>>What I love is that you can still walk onto the Washington metro, known target of AQ terrorists, without so much as a cavity search or having your son's genitals touched by a government agent.<<
To make the point for the zillionth time -- and, yes, I'd rather say this too often than not say it often enough -- it is insane, destructive, and Maginot Line-like in thinking for the U.S. to pour out so many resources, intrude so deeply on liberties, and generate so much domestic and international ill-will in dealing with one area of potential threat, out of all proportion to what it does elsewhere. And, yes, I say this in awareness that the original 9/11 attacks were against airliners and that many terrorist groups seem to have a "terrorism theater" obsession with aviation. Even so, "security" measures that do not pass a common-sense logic test ultimately generate contempt for the entities carrying them out, and for their grasp of the challenge they are undertaking and the security/liberty balance that is involved.
As seems to be happening now, with suddenly-flaring public concern about the "enhanced" security rules. The Reuters poll below is not at all "scientific," but it is interesting. More than 69,000 people have voted; 96% object to the new rules. Yes, off course, any online poll can be manipulated and could be completely misleading, but the proportions are pretty similar to those of comments on the TSA's blog. Click for larger image of poll results; original is here.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.