For social animals like humans, the health cost of loner-dom can be high—depression, high blood pressure, and an increase in stress hormones have all been linked to a lack of social connection. Previous research has also shown that when people are feeling lonely, they are better at cooperating and are more sensitive to emotions and social cues. But a new, small, weird study published in Psychological Science suggests that the isolated may cast about too wildly for companionship, leaving them with a lowered ability to tell if a face is alive or not.
Researchers at Dartmouth College and Harvard University showed a group of 30 students a series of 90 faces. Some of the faces were human, some were inanimate (a doll or a statue), and the rest were morphs of human and non-human faces, on a continuum of 0 to 100 percent human. The participants categorized each face as “animate” or “inanimate,” then, after the facial recognition task, filled out a questionnaire designed to measure their need for social connection.
On average, people started classifying the faces as “animate” when they were 69 percent human. That’s pretty normal—prior studies have shown that a face needs to have more than 50 percent human features for people to see it as alive. But the people who were really jonesing for social connection tended to have a lower threshold.
A second experiment attempted to show causation by telling participants who took a personality survey either that their lives would be filled with rich and stable relationships, or that they would be forever alone. After presumably inducing existential despair in some of the students, the researchers then showed them the doll-human hybrids. And sure enough, people who were warned that their future social life would be a bleak and icy tundra needed less “human” added to a face before seeing it as alive. Social disconnection lowered their recognition thresholds by about 7 percent.
“From an evolutionary perspective, people who can more readily detect animacy can cast a wider net when identifying possible sources of social connection, which thereby allows these individuals to maximize opportunities for renewing social relationships,” the researchers write. So, the more alive things you can find, the more potential friends you have? Seems reasonable enough, except I can’t imagine ancient humans were faced with too many half-doll/half-humans, the way participants in this study were.
“Maybe this quasi-human thing with dead eyes will be my friend,” the poor lonely students probably thought. Don’t settle for that, guys. You’re worth more.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.