New research from Michigan State University shows that leading by example promotes healthier diets among children than explicit food restrictions.
Everett Collection/Shutterstock
PROBLEM: How does parental behavior during mealtime influence children's food intake, weight, and obesity risk?
- Kids Will Eat More Veggies If They Drink Water Instead of Soda
- How the Fear of Not Having Enough Food Leads to Obesity
- Kids in Families That Eat at Home Are Healthier
METHODOLOGY: To explore the possible consequences of directive (overt) and nondirective (covert and environmental) forms of parental feeding control, Michigan State University researchers led by Megumi Murashima collected data from 330 dyads of children, aged three to five, and mothers participating in a federal preschool program for low-income families. They assessed the moms' feeding practices, the kids' food consumption, and the height and weight of both the mothers and children.
RESULTS: The moms who led by example and persuaded their kids to eat vegetables during meals had children with more nutritious, less calorie-rich diets. Those who employed overt feeding controls tended to have kids with lower body mass indices. There was no association found between the mothers' directive control and the children's food intakes.
CONCLUSION: To encourage kids to eat smart, parents should not resort to force, rewards or punishments. Co-author Sharon Hoerr says in a statement: "They'd be better off providing a healthy food environment, adopting balanced eating habits themselves, and covertly controlling their children's diet quality by not bringing less healthy foods into the house."
SOURCE: The full study, "Feeding Behaviors of Low-Income Mothers: Directive Control Relates to a Lower BMI in Children, and a Nondirective Control Relates to a Healthier Diet in Preschoolers," is published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.