I will freely admit to not having made it until the very end of West Wing, though I did love the show's prime years, Sam and Josh, Lisa Edelstein in her late-gamine years. The American President doesn't remotely hold up as a vision of politics, though it's a wonderful grown-up romantic comedy. But in both of those works, Sorkin's optimism was, even when unrealistic, contagious, refreshing, an emotionally useful corrective to a souring politics.
So why is he turning his pen to darker visions? And not just darker visions, but stunted ones. Mark Zuckerberg and John Edwards don't soar—these aren't narratives of redemption. It's as if Sorkin couldn't sustain his faith that things would turn around and express it in fiction, and so he's turned to ugly true stories. I can't explain why that is. The Bush years? The failure of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip? The failure of his screenplay for The Farnsworth Invention, his play about television's inventor, itself a highly fictionalized history (and if you're going to do that, might as well write Carter Beats the Devil) that never made it to the big screen and instead took to the stage, where it was basically panned? The only modest financial and awards performance of Charlie Wilson's War? Whatever the cause, it may signal a creative resurgence, but it's certainly a major change of vision.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.