This story is the second in a series about public preschool that will also examine Head Start, preschool solutions found in other countries, the condition of preschool teachers and the political future of preschool. The first story, about how little the U.S. invests in young children, can be found here.
BOSTON—On the ground floor of Russell Elementary School in the Dorchester neighborhood of Boston one February morning, three teachers supervised 20 students in what is considered one of the best free, public preschool programs in the country.
Sitting on a bright rug in a cozy classroom, 4- and 5-year-old students discussed how the letter M looks a lot like the letter W. Judging by their looks of concentration, this was a tricky point. Having established, with the help of Mary Bolt, the lead teacher, that their classmate Mario’s name contained an M, but not a W, they moved on to clapping once for each syllable in classmate Avah’s name and then counting the letters (four) and giving her a rousing cheer (Gimme an A! Gimme a V! Gimme an A! Gimme an H! What’s that spell? Avah!).
Next, it was free-play time. Students scattered to different areas of the room to create capes out of donated fabric in the art section, build the city of Boston out of blocks in the block section, illustrate their own books in the writing section, sketch some yellow daffodils in the science section, and play house in the make-believe section.
“Where is the ice cream?” one little girl asked, moving her father doll through every room of a toy house looking for the treat. Alas, there was no ice cream to be had, so the little girl had the father doll come up with a new plan: “Let’s go to the supermarket!”
Later, there’s storytime. First, Bolt offered a preview of the new words the kids would hear, like “ambled,” “curious,” and “swishing,” which students acted out by swaying their hands back and forth. Then Bolt read The Lion and the Little Red Bird, a story about a curious bird and a lion who loves to paint colorful scenes by using his tail as a brush and natural pigments as paint.
“Why didn’t he use paint like we have?” asked Bolt.
“No money,” suggested a girl.
“He would scare people at the store,” pointed out a boy.
In the afternoon, once recess, lunch, and nap had been wrapped up, it was math time. Bolt scattered a bunch of shapes on the rug. “What’s my rule?” she asked, urging her students to figure out what the shapes had in common. Looking at all of the various four-sided objects, none of which were squares, one child called it: “Rectangles!”
Then, once again, the kids were loosed in the room, finding math games or puzzles at all of the pint-sized tables and rug-based play areas scattered throughout. Bolt and the other adults moved from table to table asking kids questions about their pursuits or challenging them to try something new.
From start to finish, a day in Bolt’s Russell Elementary classroom could be a primer on what high-quality preschool is supposed to look like. Children had free time to play with friends in a stimulating environment, received literacy instruction that pushed beyond comprehension to critical thinking and communication, and were introduced to complex mathematics concepts in age-appropriate ways. All three practices have been shown to go beyond increasing what children know to actually improving how well they learn in kindergarten and beyond.
Boston’s preschool program, called K1 locally, serves about 68 percent of the 4-year-olds likely to enroll in public kindergarten. And while it has been criticized by some for its slow growth, the program has won repeated recognition from experts in the field for its quality and has been validated by outside researchers for being student-centered, learning-focused, and developmentally appropriate.
“If it’s not a quality program and it’s just a place for 4-year-olds to be all day, it’s not effective,” said Marie Enochty, a program director in the school district’s early-childhood education department, neatly summarizing the message heard at every turn here in Boston, from the classroom to the mayor’s office.
Providing high-quality public preschool is no small feat. Only a handful of city and state programs meet the quality standards established by the National Institute for Early Education Research, a think tank which publishes annual reports evaluating state preschool programs across the country. Boston’s program exceeds those standards. In fact, the school district here is so enamored of its preschool program that city school officials hope to soon bring the principles of high-quality early education to later grades.
The key elements of quality are simple, says Jason Sachs, the director of the district’s early-childhood education department: A great curriculum and ongoing, effective staff support. “Who the teacher is and what the teacher is teaching? Huge,” Sachs said.
Of course, myriad other factors contribute to the program’s success. To start, Boston’s students are among the highest-performing urban kids in a state routinely ranked as one of the highest-performing in the nation, as judged by reading and math scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), a test given to a representative sample of fourth- and eighth-graders.
What led to that success? It depends on whom you ask, but the answers include well-educated, well-paid teachers; strong unions; a population willing to pay significant amounts in taxes to fund education; and relatively small class sizes.
The district estimates it spends about $12,450 per K1 student each year. That helps cover a salary for an assistant teacher in every classroom and a sizeable budget for materials and supplies. That amount does not include the costs of providing one-on-one teacher coaching, improving and customizing the curriculum, and making sure each classroom meets the accreditation standards of the National Association for the Education of Young Children. Much of the funding for those functions comes from the Barr Foundation, a Boston-based philanthropy. Having private funding has been critical, Sachs said, though he doesn’t expect it to last forever. The district has also won some federal grant money.
Still, to offer universal preschool at the quality level needed, local funds and a revolving set of federal and private grants won’t cut it, Boston Public Schools Superintendent Tommy Chang said. “We need state and federal support,” Chang said.
The district does receive some ongoing state and federal funding, but officials here say it’s not enough to cover everything they need to keep quality high. As a state, Massachusetts ranks poorly on measures of access and better on measures of quality in its public preschool program.
Boston Mayor Martin Walsh, a Democrat, tries to make up what the program lacks in state support with enthusiastic local support. Like his predecessor, Thomas Menino, Walsh sees preschool investments as the key to a better educated, stronger workforce; a falling crime and incarceration rate; a growing stream of new businesses to “Bean Town”; and a more affordable cost of living for residents. Despite a budget deficit, Walsh committed $3.1 million to public preschool for the 2016-17 fiscal year. “It’s an investment in the future of America,” Walsh said. “It’s an investment in young people. Any time we can make an investment in young people, it’s a positive step for a city.”
And then there’s Sachs. He has been leading the district’s early-education department for more than a decade. His blunt confidence in the system-changing potential of high-quality early education and his indefatigable pursuit of the funds needed to do so make him a forceful presence in the district.
Sachs worked on early-learning policy in the state education department before moving to Boston. Now, he leads a 21-person team of coaches and curriculum experts. Sachs and his team have brought in so much money through outside grants that only seven of the team’s positions are paid for directly by the district.
Thanks to Sachs’s laser focus on quality, a teacher like Bolt, who’s 10 years into her career, is constantly interacting with the team that developed the curriculum she uses in her classroom. She gives them feedback on what works or doesn’t work with her students and then tries out potential improvements. She sticks to a district-wide schedule, but has the prerogative to make alterations as she sees fit. Bolt says she follows her kids’ cues. If they’re bored by a book she’s supposed to read several times, for instance, she moves on to a new one. Still, she has no hesitation about using a curriculum aimed at increasing academic abilities, including skills like critical thinking and problem solving.
“The curriculum is so fun, they don’t realize it’s rigorous,” Bolt said. “Kids tell parents on Saturday that they want to go to school. If we were drilling them and doing worksheets, they wouldn’t be saying that.”
Such a planned learning environment is anathema to some early educators. The necessity, or even benefit, of hiring teachers with bachelor’s degrees or having a structured curriculum is still a matter of debate in early education. But many non-public-school preschool programs in Boston have bought into the district’s way of thinking, largely because of an initiative that provides their teachers with additional training and pay.
Using funds from a federal Preschool Expansion Grant, Boston will support 300 spots in community-based preschools next fall in addition to its 2,800 public-school-based spots, according to Daniel O’Brien, a district spokesman. Part of the Obama administration’s push to improve public preschool programs, the grant should provide $15 million annually for four years to be split between five Massachusetts communities.
While each Preschool Expansion Grant recipient has outlined a different plan for using its funds, Boston is focused on improving citywide preschool quality. Participating teachers learn how to teach the public-school curriculum and a receive pay bump that brings them up to par with the starting salary for a Boston Public Schools teacher, which is $52,632 for a teacher with a bachelor’s degree, but no master’s degree.
“It’s totally helped,” said Mary Kinsella Scannell, the vice president of the nonprofit Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester, which offers daycare and preschool to children ranging from 2 months to 5 years old. “Our programs have been strengthened by BPS [Boston Public Schools] and to some extent, BPS has been strengthened by community-based organizations.”
Kinsella Scannell started working with the district in 2006 as part of a pilot public-private partnership model. Since then the program has gone through two rounds of expansion. Some, Kinsella Scannell acknowledges, are wary of working within the more rigid structure of the public-school system.
And results have been mixed so far. During the second phase of the partnership program, children did improve both their literacy and math skills when their teachers had received more instruction on how to teach those things. However, not all of the center-based teachers used the district curriculum consistently. And the pay increase for lead teachers didn’t eliminate turnover, a constant problem for most private preschools. In this, its third phase, Boston has tried to address those issues by improving its training model and extending the pay bump, albeit on a smaller scale, to assistant teachers.
If Boston’s initiative to involve more community-based preschools works, it could provide a model for cities and states across the country that are trying to perfect partnerships between districts and private providers as a potentially faster and cheaper solution to expanding public preschool.
Meanwhile, back at Russell Elementary School, yet another compelling result of Boston Public Schools’ increased focus on early education is playing out two stories up, in Ed Ballard’s third-grade classroom.
Instead of sitting at their desks one afternoon, kids sprawled on the floor around a giant sheet of paper covered in fraction calculations or gathered at a kid-sized table to solve a complex word problem. According to Ballard, this is at least a weekly sight in his classroom these days.
“I like doing group work, because if we have a question, [our classmates] can give us an opinion or help us figure it out,” said Vianca Melo, 9, a member of the fractions group. “We don’t have to struggle.”
Working in groups, or “centers” where kids can explore different activities in different areas of the room, is not a new idea in elementary education, but Ballard’s room is on the leading edge of a new focus in Boston that Sachs likes to call “percolating up.” That means the ideas that have been found to be effective in the earliest grades are now beginning to be applied to later grades.
“We didn’t used to do reading groups and centers so much in third grade,” said Ballard, Vianca’s teacher. “They really can get things clarified. I say things a certain way. [In groups,] they can hear it in another way. They’re more interested in talking to each other.”
Changing all of early elementary school in a methodical and purposeful way to better resemble the student-centered structure of preschool would be a much bigger win than just proving that preschool helps students do better in kindergarten, Sachs said. And those aren’t just words. Starting this coming school year, his department will be responsible not just for preschool and kindergarten curriculum and coaching, but for first and second grade as well.
“The impact of prekindergarten is significant and substantial, but there is some ‘fade,’” Sachs said, using a common term to describe how the academic benefits preschool graduates display when they first enter kindergarten often seem to “fade” as they move up. “That’s why we moved on,” he said, “because the fade is not in the kids; it’s in the program.”
Despite its success, Boston faces hurdles. For one, its highest-income residents tend to view their city’s public schools as a last resort. Were they involved, higher-income parents could bring the power of their wealth and political muscle to expanding the program to serve all children.
“Boston NAEP scores are great, but in the context of Massachusetts, we’re not getting the job done,” Sachs said.
The city also has minimum support from the state, which provides free preschool to just 7 percent, or about 6,500, of the state’s nearly 92,000 4-year-olds, according to the National Institute for Early Education Research. Republican Governor Charlie Baker has not made preschool a signature issue, though he did authorize an incremental increase in funding that will serve 2,000 additional students in the coming school year.
Steven Barnett, the director of the National Institute for Early Education Research, thinks that cities, not states, are leading the way to the idea that preschool should be a right guaranteed to every 4-year-old in America. Major changes in education policy “tend to come locality by locality, rather than statewide,” Barnett said. “If we look at the introduction of the comprehensive high school, the big cities led the way on that,” he said. Now, Barnett thinks we could be about to see the same kind of widespread adoption for public preschool, one city at a time.
And he may be right, because Boston isn’t an anomaly. New York City, Cleveland, Denver, Seattle, Los Angeles, and San Antonio, to name a few, also have large and growing public preschool programs. In many cases, Barnett said, that’s because they were “dissatisfied” with what their state has to offer. Several city mayors, especially former Mayor Julian Castro in San Antonio and Mayor Bill de Blasio in New York, even made expanding preschool a key campaign issue.
At a meeting of the Boston Public Schools Early Education Department in February, the staff was working on offering productive critical feedback to teachers. They watched a video of a teacher who kept her kids sitting on a rug for a 30-minute morning meeting. There were groans from the staff. The classroom in the video, though friendly and warm, did not look as engaging or productive as Mary Bolt’s classroom and the coaches, most of whom know Bolt, agreed that it was not.
After the video, the group broke into teams to role-play a coaching meeting with the teacher in the video. “I think it’s a delicate balance,” said the longtime coach Nicole St. Victor. “Sometimes the person will say, ‘Oh yeah, next time I’ll make sure circle time is shorter’ but not elaborate. And you want the teacher to understand the rationale behind that. So you keep talking.”
St. Victor has studied early childhood in Haiti and law in Paris and then early childhood again in the United States. She takes her work very seriously and is insistent that there’s always room for improvement. “Just because you have 20 years doing something, doesn’t mean you’re doing it well,” she said.
Her way of thinking is echoed by most of the early-education staff and by teachers like Bolt and Ballard. There’s always room for improvement. So while Boston’s program is exceptional by the standards of what is offered nationally, no one here is satisfied.
This post appears courtesy of The Hechinger Report.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.