Salmon argued against donations earmarked for Japan because it's better to give unrestricted funds than to "try to target money at whichever disaster might be in the news today." Tyler Cowen counters:

1. The chance that your aid will be usefully deployed, and not lost to corruption, is much higher than average.

2. I believe this crisis will bring fundamental regime change to Japan (currently an underreported issue), rather than just altering the outcome of the next election.  America needs to signal its partnership with one of its most important allies.  You can help us do that.

3. Maybe you should give to a poorer country instead, but you probably won’t.  Odds are this will be an extra donation at the relevant margin.  Sorry to say, this disaster has no “close substitute.”

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to