The Freakonomics blog weighs in on the charity for catastrophe debate, by excerpting from their chapter on altruism in SuperFreakonomics:

One recent academic study found that a given disaster received an 18 percent spike in charitable aid for each seven hundred-word newspaper article and a 13 percent spike for every sixty seconds of TV news coverage. (Anyone hoping to raise money for a Third World disaster had better hope it happens on a slow news day.) And such disasters are by their nature anomalies especially noisy ones, like shark attacks that probably don’t have much to say about our baseline altruism.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to