After reading the National Review piece on the controversy, Adam Serwer offers a substantial critique that goes beyond previously aired objections of Dish readers and casts doubt on some of Dan Foster's core claims. Says Serwer in his conclusion: "I don't see how Foster has proved that billions were wasted or that there is systemic fraud in the Pigford settlement." The two are schedule to debate the matter on Bloggingheads.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.