by Patrick Appel

Michelle Goldberg watches as Egypt splits Republicans:

Now, as Egyptians pour into the streets and demand control of their political destiny, an interesting divide is opening up on the right. On one side are those who actually took all that democracy stuff seriously. On the other are those who see the Muslim world only as an enemy to be crushed and controlled. With a Republican primary approaching, it remains to be seen which view of Middle Eastern policy will triumph among conservatives.

As I wrote earlier, this is a somewhat simplistic understanding of the democracy debate as a whole. David Sessions doesn't like how Goldberg attributes Beck's position to the religious right:

Glenn Beck’s crazed notion that the Egyptian revolution is really a progressive plot to overthrow America is not “rampant on the religious right” just because John Hagee, a fringe pro-Israel preacher few Christians have heard of, is saying outrageous things again. When I have written presumptively about the religious right’s political views, they have been quick to assure me that they don’t necessarily watch or agree with Glenn Beck (though other anecdotal evidence suggests some of them do). But again, the only people referenced here are Hagee and Mike Huckabee, neither of whom really speak for the rank-and-file of the religious right in any way significant enough to label their opinions “rampant.”

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.