by Chris Bodenner

Blake Hounshell challenges the WaPo's "rather predictable criticism" of the Obama administration's measured response to Egypt:

Instead of having Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama say some magic democracy words, I'd much rather see the United States think hard about its system of support for these autocrats. Can the U.S. credibly call for freedom in Egypt when it's subsidizing the Egyptian military to the tune of a billion and a half dollars a year? Is Egypt really so helpful when it comes to the "peace process" between Israel and the Palestinians? Can we live with the Muslim Brotherhood in power, or closer to it? If the answer to these questions is the same as it's been for the last few decades, it's probably best to keep our big mouths shut.

The latest from the secretary of state:

In unusually blunt remarks regarding the longtime US ally delivered on Wednesday, Clinton also said that the Mubarak government should not prevent peaceful protests or block social networking sites such as Twitter or Facebook, which have helped Egyptians plan and spread news about the unrest.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.