In National Affairs, Daniel Desalvo is taking on public employee unions:
The emergence of powerful public-sector unions was by no means inevitable. Prior to the 1950s, as labor lawyer Ida Klaus remarked in 1965, "the subject of labor relations in public employment could not have meant less to more people, both in and out of government." To the extent that people thought about it, most politicians, labor leaders, economists, and judges opposed collective bargaining in the public sector ...
[Even] F.D.R. believed that "[a] strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent on their part to obstruct the operations of government until their demands are satisfied. Such action looking toward the paralysis of government by those who have sworn to support it is unthinkable and intolerable." Roosevelt was hardly alone in holding these views, even among the champions of organized labor. Indeed, the first president of the AFL-CIO, George Meany, believed it was "impossible to bargain collectively with the government."
I think a key test of future Democratic seriousness with repect to making government work more efficiently will be their attitude toward public sector unions. On education, Obama has made a decent start. But there's far more work to be done.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to firstname.lastname@example.org.