David Frum compares America's political conventions to their British equivalent:

When I spoke to British politicos about their conference, they would speak with wistful envy of the grander, gaudier spectacle of the U.S. conventions. And who doesn’t like a tiger-striped cocktail? But there is this to be said for simplicity:

The fantastic expense of the American convention has to be paid by somebody, and that “somebody” usually turns out to be a corporate sponsor with an agenda of his own. The low-cost British equivalent pays its own way, by charging a hefty fee of all attendees, especially media. I paid 600 pounds for my press credentials. It’s a cleaner way of doing business, I grant. And the combination of higher charges for unlavish proceedings is as good a way as any of preparing the media and the delegates for the forthcoming era of British budget austerity.

Perhaps Americans will be ready for an austere convention by 2012.

We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.